Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The table shows the percentage of literacy and employment in different countries in the 1990s and 2010s Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant v.1

The table shows the percentage of literacy and employment in different countries in the 1990s and 2010s
The table chart compares five different countries, namely USA, China, UK, Australia and India in terms of the proportion of literacy and employment between 1990 and 2010. In general, there was a considerable increase in the percentage of literate people in different countries over the period shown. In addition, the proportion of employees in USA and India saw the most dramatic growth from 1990 to 2010. The most dramatically rise in literate population was seen in China. The percentage of literacy in China was the lowest in the 1990s, at 42%, whereas the figure for China was over 90% in the 2010s. By contrast, USA witnessed the lowest rate of increase in literacy from 1990 to 2010 was only around 20%. The proportion of Australian who could read and write was the highest in the 2010s, which went up from 49% in the 1990s to 95% in the 2010s. UK and India were similar, which rose by around 30% during this period. Throughout the period shown, the percentage of workers in USA, India and Australia experienced an upward trend, while the figure for China and UK saw a downward trend. Both the figure for employment in USA and India went up rapidly by 40% from 1990 to 2010 compare with the percentage of Australian workers increased minimally by 2% over the same period. The proportion for UK was the highest employment in the 1990s, which stood at almost 80%, after falling to 60% in the 2010s. The figure for Chinese employees declined slightly by about 5% over the period shown.
The table chart compares five
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
different
countries,
namely
USA, China, UK, Australia and India in terms of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
proportion
of literacy and employment between 1990 and 2010.

In general
, there was a considerable increase in the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
percentage
of literate
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
in
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
different
countries
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
over
the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
period
shown.
In addition
, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
proportion
of employees
A determiner is probably missing here: "in the USA".
in USA
and India
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
saw
the most dramatic growth from 1990 to 2010.

The most
dramatically
rise in literate population was
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
seen
in China. The
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
percentage
of literacy in China was the lowest in the 1990s, at 42%, whereas the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
figure
for China was
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
over
90% in the 2010s. By contrast, USA witnessed the lowest rate of increase in literacy from 1990 to 2010 was
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
around 20%. The
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
proportion
of Australian who could read and write was the highest in the 2010s, which went up from 49% in the 1990s to 95% in the 2010s. UK and India were similar, which rose by around 30% during this period.

Throughout the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
period
shown, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
percentage
of workers
A determiner is probably missing here: "in the USA".
in USA
, India and Australia experienced an upward trend, while the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
figure
for China and UK
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
saw
a downward trend. Both the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
figure
for employment
A determiner is probably missing here: "in the USA".
in USA
and India went up
rapidly
by 40% from 1990 to 2010 compare with the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
percentage
of Australian workers increased
minimally
by 2%
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
over
the same
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
period
. The
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
proportion
for UK was the highest employment in the 1990s, which stood at almost 80%, after falling to 60% in the 2010s. The
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
figure
for Chinese employees declined
slightly
by about 5%
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
over
the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
period
shown.
3Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
20Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
3Mistakes

IELTS academic The table shows the percentage of literacy and employment in different countries in the 1990s and 2010s

Academic
  American English
4 paragraphs
260 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 7.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • ?
    Include an introduction and conclusion
  • ?
    Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • ?
    Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • ?
    Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Similar posts


Recent posts