Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The table below shows the production of milk annually in four countries in 1990, 2000 and 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the man features and make comparisons where relevant. v.4

The table below shows the production of milk annually in four countries in 1990, 2000 and 2010.
The rendered tabular chart compares the yearly production of milk in the Netherland, Austraila, Tanzania, Guatemala over three years 1990, 2000, 2010. Overall, it is clear that the production of milk increased in all given countries expect for Australia. Netherland experienced a maximum milk production while, minimum production of milk witnessed in Guatemala. In the fleeting glance it is immensely clear that, Netherland accounted for 11, 262, 000 and 11, 155, 000 of milk production in the first two years respectively, subsequently to which the number rose upto 11, 466, 000 litter in 2010. In contrast, the respective figure for Guatemala in the years 1990, 2000, 2010 were recorded to be 26, 000, 55, 000 and 84, 000 litter. Which happened to be the least. Probing further, as regard Tabzanai the production of milk witnessed a growth from 87, 000 litter in 1990 to 1, 42, 000 litter in 2000, following they reached to 1, 55, 000 litter in the end of period. As for as Australia was concerned there was decreasing to 11, 105, 00 litter in 2000 and the milk production again dwindled to 9, 165, 000 litter in the year 2010.
The rendered tabular chart compares the yearly
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
production
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
milk
in the
Possible spelling mistake found.
Netherland
,
Possible spelling mistake found.
Austraila
, Tanzania, Guatemala over three years 1990, 2000, 2010.

Overall
, it is
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
clear
that the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
production
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
milk
increased in all
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
given
countries
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
expect
for Australia.
Possible spelling mistake found.
Netherland
experienced a maximum
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
milk
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
production
while, minimum
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
production
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
milk
witnessed in Guatemala.

In the fleeting glance it is
immensely
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
clear
that,
Possible spelling mistake found.
Netherland
accounted for 11, 262, 000 and 11, 155, 000 of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
milk
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
production
in the
first
two years
respectively
,
subsequently
to which the number rose
Possible spelling mistake found.
upto
11, 466, 000
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
litter
in 2010.
In contrast
, the respective figure for Guatemala in the years 1990, 2000, 2010
were recorded
to be 26, 000, 55, 000 and 84, 000
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
litter
.
“Which” at the beginning of a sentence usually requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
Which
happened to be the least.

Probing
further
, as regard
Possible spelling mistake found.
Tabzanai
the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
production
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
milk
witnessed a growth from 87, 000
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
litter
in 1990 to 1, 42, 000
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
litter
in 2000, following they reached to 1, 55, 000
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
litter
in the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
end
of period. As for as Australia
was concerned
there was decreasing to 11, 105, 00
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
litter
in 2000 and the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
milk
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
production
again dwindled to 9, 165, 000
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
litter
in the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
year
2010.
4Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
22Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
7Mistakes

IELTS academic The table below shows the production of milk annually in four countries in 1990, 2000 and 2010.

Academic
  American English
4 paragraphs
194 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 7.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • ?
    Include an introduction and conclusion
  • ?
    Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • ?
    Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • ?
    Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Similar posts


Recent posts