Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The pie charts below show the percentages of each material thrown out by the average household in California in 1985 and 2002. v.2

The pie charts below show the percentages of each material thrown out by the average household in California in 1985 and 2002. v. 2
The graphs compare the amount of 8 different waste products produced by typical households in California in two separate years, 1985 and 2002. Overall, of the eight waste materials thrown out wood, glass, papers and metals' figures are the only ones that increased, whereas the proportion for textile, kitchen/organic waste and dust and cinders decreased significantly. It is also noticeable that the percentage for plastic remained stable over a 17 year period. The numbers for both glass and metals showed a significant rise of 10% in 2002 to 12% and 16% respectively. Papers were the most common waste product in both years, which percentage rose from just over a third to 44%, while the amount of wood displayed a negligible growth of 1% in 2002. Among the 3 categories of household wastes that declined, kitchen/organic waste had the most dramatic drop from 28% to 4% in 2002. Dust and cinders comprised the next highest reduction in percentage and fell by 4%, and textile dropped by only 1%. The figure for plastic maintained the same with 7% after 17 years.
The graphs compare the amount of 8
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
different
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
waste
products produced by typical households in California in two separate years, 1985 and 2002.

Overall
, of the eight
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
waste
materials thrown out wood, glass, papers and
Possible spelling mistake found.
metals&
#039; figures are the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
ones that increased, whereas the proportion for textile, kitchen/organic
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
waste
and dust and cinders decreased
significantly
. It is
also
noticeable that the percentage for plastic remained stable over a 17
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
year
period.

The numbers for both glass and metals
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
showed
a significant rise of 10% in 2002 to 12% and 16%
respectively
. Papers were the most common
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
waste
product in both years, which percentage rose from
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
just
over a third to 44%, while the amount of wood displayed a negligible growth of 1% in 2002.

Among the 3 categories of household
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
wastes
that declined, kitchen/organic
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
waste
had the most dramatic drop from 28% to 4% in 2002. Dust and cinders comprised the
next
highest reduction in percentage and fell by 4%, and textile dropped by
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
1%. The figure for plastic maintained the same with 7% after 17 years.
3Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
7Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
2Mistakes

IELTS academic The pie charts below show the percentages of each material thrown out by the average household in California in 1985 and 2002. v. 2

Academic
  American English
4 paragraphs
179 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 7.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • ?
    Include an introduction and conclusion
  • ?
    Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • ?
    Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.0
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.5
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • ?
    Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Similar posts


Recent posts