Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The line graph below provides the number of international conferences in three cities from 1965 to 2010. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. v.2

The line graph below provides the number of international conferences in three cities from 1965 to 2010.
The presented chart compares 3 cities in terms of global meetings they organized between 1965 and 2010. Overall, international conferences were held in all cities over the period. In addition, while the figures for city A and city B generally decreased, there was an opposite trend in that of city C. Turning into detail, 35 foreign meetings were organized in city A in 1965, which was a bit higher than a more-than-30-conference number of city B. In the next 20 years, while the figure for city B declined gradually to exactly 25 conferences, that of city A fell sharply to 20 meetings in 1975 before growing substantially by 10 conferences in 1985. Throughout the remainders of the period, oscillation were witnessed in both the number for city A and city B, remaining at over 20 and 25 conferences, respectively. Regarding to city C, starting at only 5, its number of international meetings doubled in 1975. The figure grew considerably to more than 25 conferences in the next 20 years. It declined slightly before reaching the peak of 30 meetings in 2010, surpassing two remaining cities as the most popular venue for global conferences among three surveyed hosts.
The presented chart compares 3
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cities
in terms of global
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
meetings
they organized between 1965 and 2010.

Overall
, international
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
conferences
were held
in all
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cities
over the period.
In addition
, while the figures for city A and city B
generally
decreased, there was an opposite trend in that of city C.

Turning into detail, 35 foreign
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
meetings
were organized
in city A in 1965, which was a bit higher than a more-than-30-conference number of city B. In the
next
20 years, while the figure for city B declined
gradually
to exactly 25
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
conferences
, that of city A fell
sharply
to 20
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
meetings
in 1975
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
before
growing
substantially
by 10
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
conferences
in 1985. Throughout the remainders of the period, oscillation
were witnessed
in both the number for city A and city B, remaining at over 20 and 25
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
conferences
,
respectively
.

The phrase 'Regarding to' is not correct. Use "Regarding" or "regard to".
Regarding to
city C, starting at
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
5, its number of international
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
meetings
doubled in 1975. The figure grew
considerably
to more than 25
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
conferences
in the
next
20 years. It declined
slightly
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
before
reaching the peak of 30
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
meetings
in 2010, surpassing two remaining
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cities
as the most popular venue for global
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
conferences
among three surveyed hosts.
5Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
14Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
1Mistakes

IELTS academic The line graph below provides the number of international conferences in three cities from 1965 to 2010.

Academic
  American English
4 paragraphs
197 words
6.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 7.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • ?
    Include an introduction and conclusion
  • ?
    Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • ?
    Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 6.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.5
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • ?
    Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Similar posts


Recent posts