Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The graph below shows waste recycling rates in the U. S. from 1960 to 2011. Unit is measured in million tons and the percent recycling on total trash produced. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons wher v.3

The graph below shows waste recycling rates in the U. S. from 1960 to 2011. Unit is measured in million tons and the percent recycling on total trash produced.
The given line graph illustrates information from the research into how many million tons of garbage were recovered and how much that amount of waste accounted for the total weight of trash that the Americans produced over a 51-year period between 1960 and 2011. Overall, according to the data, the weight of trash we recycled pumped up significantly. Additionally, we were able to recycle a larger percentage of rubbish over the period. To be specific, during the former half period, the amount of trash recycled saw an upward trend from nearly 6 million tons in 1960 to just under 17 million tons in 1985. Exchanging into percentage of total waste produced, the recovered garbage in 1985 accounted for more than 6% but in 1985 the proportion was rose to 10. 1%. Turning to the latter half period, the weight quickly reached its peak at nearly 90 million tons in 2011 due to a gradual upsurge from the initial of this second-half period. Meanwhile, this figure accounted for 34, 7% in the total of trash littered, more than tripled comparing to the percentage calculated in 1985.
The
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
given
line graph illustrates information from the research into how
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
million
tons of garbage
were recovered
and how much that amount of waste accounted for the total weight of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
trash
that the Americans produced over a 51-year
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
period
between 1960 and 2011.

Overall
, according to the data, the weight of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
trash
we recycled pumped up
significantly
.
Additionally
, we were able to recycle a larger percentage of rubbish over the period.

To be specific, during the former half
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
period
, the amount of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
trash
recycled
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
saw
an upward trend from
nearly
6
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
million
tons in 1960 to
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
just
under 17
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
million
tons in 1985. Exchanging into percentage of total waste produced, the recovered garbage in 1985 accounted for more than 6%
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
in 1985 the proportion was rose to 10. 1%.

Turning to the latter half
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
period
, the weight
quickly
reached its peak at
nearly
90
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
million
tons in 2011 due to a gradual upsurge from the initial of this second-half
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
period
. Meanwhile, this figure accounted for 34, 7% in the total of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
trash
littered, more than tripled comparing to the percentage calculated in 1985.
2Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
12Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
0Mistakes
One language sets you in a corridor for life. Two languages open every door along the way.
Frank Smith

IELTS academic The graph below shows waste recycling rates in the U. S. from 1960 to 2011. Unit is measured in million tons and the percent recycling on total trash produced.

Academic
  American English
4 paragraphs
185 words
6.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 7.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • ?
    Include an introduction and conclusion
  • ?
    Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • ?
    Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 7.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • ?
    Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Similar posts


Recent posts