Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The graph below shows waste recycling rates in the U. S. from 1960 to 2011. v.2

The graph below shows waste recycling rates in the U. S. from 1960 to 2011. v. 2
The line chart outlines how much waste was recycled in the US between 1960 and 2011. The garbage recycling is presented both in quantity, in million tons, and percentage. Generally speaking, waste recycling in the US after 1985 increased remarkably despite a big proportion of litter remained unrecycled. As the data suggests, 5. 6 million tons rubbish was recycled in the USA in 1960 which accounted for 6. 4% of the trash production in this year. The recycling in 1965 slightly declined but increased in 1970 when 6. 6% waste recycling took place. In 1980, more than 14 million tons of garbage was recycled and it developed by almost 2% after 5 years. After a decade, 16% of total waste was recycled and this ratio after that increased steadily. Almost one-third of the surplus was recycled in 2005 which amounted nearly 80 million tons. A through observation indicates that a great percentage of scrap in the US is not recycled. For instance, 80 million tons, about 31% waste recycling figure in the US shows that another 160 million tons are not recycled. Finally, in 2011, more than one-third rubbish was recycled which accounted for around 87 million tons of waste produced in the USA.
The line chart outlines how much
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
waste
was
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
recycled
in the US between 1960 and 2011. The garbage
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
recycling
is presented
both in quantity, in
Use "a million" or use a number before 'million'.
million
tons, and percentage.
Generally
speaking,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
waste
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
recycling
in the US after 1985 increased
remarkably
despite a
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
big
proportion of litter remained
Possible spelling mistake found.
unrecycled
.

As the data suggests, 5. 6
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
million
tons rubbish was
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
recycled
in the USA in 1960 which accounted for 6. 4% of the trash production in this year. The
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
recycling
in 1965
slightly
declined
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
increased in 1970 when 6. 6%
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
waste
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
recycling
took place. In 1980, more than 14
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
million
tons of garbage was
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
recycled
and it developed by almost 2% after 5 years. After a decade, 16% of total
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
waste
was
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
recycled
and this ratio after that increased
steadily
.

Almost one-third of the surplus was
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
recycled
in 2005 which amounted
nearly
80
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
million
tons. A
Did you mean "thorough" (accurate, exhaustive)?
through
observation indicates that a great percentage of scrap in the US is not
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
recycled
.
For instance
, 80
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
million
tons, about 31%
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
waste
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
recycling
figure in the US
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
shows
that another 160
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
million
tons are not
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
recycled
.
Finally
, in 2011, more than one-third rubbish was
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
recycled
which accounted for around 87
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
million
tons of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
waste
produced in the USA.
3Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
26Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
3Mistakes

IELTS academic The graph below shows waste recycling rates in the U. S. from 1960 to 2011. v. 2

Academic
  American English
3 paragraphs
204 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 7.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • ?
    Include an introduction and conclusion
  • ?
    Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • ?
    Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 6.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • ?
    Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Similar posts


Recent posts