Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The bar chart below shows the percentage of government spending on roads and transport in4 countries in the years 1990 1995 2000 2005. v.2

The bar chart below shows the percentage of government spending on roads and transport in4 countries in the years 1990 1995 2000 2005. v. 2
The graph illustrates the proportion of expenditure the government spent on transportation related in terms of four different countries (Italy, Portugal, UK, US) between 1990 and 2005. Overall, it can clearly be seen that the amount of money used for infrastructure in Portugal lessen each year. Meanwhile, except for the year of 1995, the US government invested more money on roads and transport. In the year of 1990, Portugal funded about 27% of their expenditures on infrastructure, in which it provided the largest amount of money out of 4 countries. Similar to Portugal, Italy also spent more than 20% to upgrade and expand public provision. Meanwhile, the UK spent the least, where only 10% of government revenue was put into road and transport. The US spent slightly more than the UK, with approximately 11%. Over 5-year interval, all 4 countries had their expenditures declined, approximately 1% to 3% fell. In 2000, Italy, the UK, and the USA significantly invested more fund on transport infrastructure, in which increased to 23%, 12% and 13% respectively. Whereas the proportion of fund spent in Portugal continued to decrease to around 22% in the same period and then to 20% after another 5 years, where Italy and the UK also had their spending fell almost 5%. The USA was the only country that funded extra, where its percentage rose up to 15%.
The graph illustrates the proportion of expenditure the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
government
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
spent
on transportation related in terms of four
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
different
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
countries
(Italy, Portugal, UK, US) between 1990 and 2005.

Overall
, it can
clearly
be
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
seen
that the amount of money
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
used
for infrastructure in Portugal lessen each
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
year
. Meanwhile,
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
except for
the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
year
of 1995, the US
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
government
invested more money on roads and transport.

In the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
year
of 1990, Portugal funded about 27% of their expenditures on infrastructure, in which it provided the largest amount of money out of 4
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
countries
. Similar to Portugal, Italy
also
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
spent
more than 20% to upgrade and expand public provision. Meanwhile, the UK
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
spent
the least, where
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
10% of
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
government
revenue
was put
into road and transport. The US
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
spent
slightly
more than the UK, with approximately 11%. Over
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
5-year
interval, all 4
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
countries
had their expenditures declined, approximately 1% to 3% fell.

In 2000, Italy, the UK, and the USA
significantly
invested more fund on transport infrastructure, in which increased to 23%, 12% and 13%
respectively
. Whereas the proportion of fund
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
spent
in Portugal continued to decrease to around 22% in the same period and then to 20% after another 5 years, where Italy and the UK
also
had their spending fell almost 5%. The USA was the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
country
that funded extra, where its percentage rose up to 15%.
4Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
13Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
0Mistakes

IELTS academic The bar chart below shows the percentage of government spending on roads and transport in4 countries in the years 1990 1995 2000 2005. v. 2

Academic
  American English
4 paragraphs
227 words
6.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 7.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • ?
    Include an introduction and conclusion
  • ?
    Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • ?
    Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 7.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • ?
    Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Similar posts


Recent posts