Nowadays, school should reward for the students who have the best final result or the students having the most improved process has been a controversial topic for a long time. Some people say that academic performance is the most reasonable way to reward while others, include me argue that the first statement is extremely deserve.
On the one hand, there are more and more schools taking the improvement into consideration that brings lots of advantages which no one can deny completely. At first, everyone is given the same oppoturnities to express themselves and achieve prizes, unexcept students with bad result. they will try their best and work even more harder to show to dramatic advancement. moreover, without the score pressure, students can stay out of stressful and learning by their heart, instead of beeing so sensitive about the points.
On the other hand, when the benefits of final result are taken into consideration, I believe that are much more essential. The first reason is the toppers always have to attempt more extremely than others to get the prizes, rewarding either improved students can make them feel beeing equated and unfair. As a result, when all they hard works are not respected, there are no more reasons for them to motivate anymore. Secondly, that solution creates an obvious goal for students so they can get used to highly intense pressure. Consequently, they can adapt to a new environment more easily, especially when they study aboard. moreover, rewarding in this way not only brings about benefits for students but also help schools to develop. Thanks to this solvement, schools will recognize the gifted to nurture and develop their talents to attend important international competition more effectively.
In conclusion, rewarding students has been a phenomenon topic for a century. Althought many advantages that giving prizes for academic performances brings about, others, include me, support that the rest solution is much more reasonable.
Nowadays,
school
should reward for the
students
who have the best final
result
or the
students
having the most
improved
process has been a controversial topic for a long time.
Some
people
say that academic performance is the most reasonable way to reward while others, include me argue that the
first
statement is
extremely
deserve
.
On the one hand, there are more and more
schools
taking the improvement into consideration that brings lots of advantages which no one can deny completely. At
first
, everyone is
given
the same
oppoturnities
to express themselves and achieve prizes,
unexcept
students
with
bad
result
.
they
will try their best and work even
more harder
to
show
to dramatic advancement.
moreover
, without the score pressure,
students
can stay out of stressful and learning by their heart,
instead
of
beeing
so
sensitive about the points.
On the
other
hand, when the benefits of final
result
are taken
into consideration, I believe that are much more essential. The
first
reason is the toppers always
have to
attempt more
extremely
than others to
get
the prizes, rewarding either
improved
students
can
make
them feel
beeing
equated and unfair. As a
result
, when all they
hard
works are not respected, there are no more reasons for them to motivate anymore.
Secondly
, that solution creates an obvious goal for
students
so
they can
get
used
to
highly
intense pressure.
Consequently
, they can adapt to a new environment more
easily
,
especially
when they study aboard.
moreover
, rewarding in this way not
only
brings about benefits for
students
but
also
help
schools
to develop. Thanks to this
solvement
,
schools
will recognize the gifted to nurture and develop their talents to attend
important
international competition more
effectively
.
In conclusion
, rewarding
students
has been a phenomenon topic for a century.
Althought
many
advantages that giving prizes for academic performances brings about, others, include me, support that the rest solution is much more reasonable.