Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Percentage of food budget spent on restaurant meals and home cooking in four years and number of meals per year fast food vs sit-down restaurant meals. v.2

Percentage of food budget spent on restaurant meals and home cooking in four years and number of meals per year fast food vs sit-down restaurant meals. v. 2
The first circular layout depicts the information about the average expenditure on restaurant and home made meals, and the linear representation reveals the comparison between utilisation of junk food and sit-down restaurant meals per year: 1970, 1980, 1990 and 2000. Collaboration of data is done in percentage. Overall, it is crystal clear that, the total expenses on restaurant feed had been increased through out the years. Although, the number of meals for sit-down restaurant showed significant increment, per year. It can be seen that, in the year 1970, just 10% of the total amount spent on restaurant meals, less than that of home cooking, that was 90%, and it further showed decreased trend till 2000. Moreover, the cost of bar feed were sugerd by 15 and 35%, respectively, during 1980 and1990. Apart from this, the budget was contemplated half for the same profile, in 2000. Moving further, in the linear layout, the consumption of junk food and sit-down restaurant meals were similar, that was 20 meals, in 1970. Furthermore, the number of meals for fast food and sit-down restaurant showed steady increase till 1980 at nearly about 27 and 35, respectively. In contrast, the utilisation of sit-down restaurant meals were dramatically inclined to about 85 meals, as compared to junk food, which exceeded to more than 40 meals, from 1990 to 2000.
The
first
circular layout depicts the information about the average expenditure on
restaurant
and home made
meals
, and the linear representation reveals the comparison between
utilisation
of junk
food
and
sit-down
restaurant
meals
per year: 1970, 1980, 1990 and 2000. Collaboration of data
is done
in percentage.

Overall
, it is crystal
clear
that, the total expenses on
restaurant
feed had
been increased
through out
the years. Although, the number of
meals
for
sit-down
restaurant
showed
significant increment, per year.

It can be
seen
that, in the year 1970,
just
10% of the total amount spent on
restaurant
meals
, less than that of home cooking, that was 90%, and it
further
showed
decreased trend till 2000.
Moreover
, the cost of bar feed were
sugerd
by 15 and 35%,
respectively
, during 1980 and1990. Apart from this, the budget
was contemplated
half for the same profile, in 2000.

Moving
further
, in the linear layout, the consumption of junk
food
and
sit-down
restaurant
meals
were similar, that was 20
meals
, in 1970.
Furthermore
, the number of
meals
for
fast
food
and
sit-down
restaurant
showed
steady increase till 1980 at
nearly
about 27 and 35,
respectively
.
In contrast
, the
utilisation
of
sit-down
restaurant
meals
were
dramatically
inclined to about 85
meals
, as compared to junk
food
, which exceeded to more than 40
meals
, from 1990 to 2000.
7Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
27Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
4Mistakes
Knowledge of languages is the doorway to wisdom.
Roger Bacon

IELTS academic Percentage of food budget spent on restaurant meals and home cooking in four years and number of meals per year fast food vs sit-down restaurant meals. v. 2

Academic
  American English
4 paragraphs
222 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 7.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • ?
    Include an introduction and conclusion
  • ?
    Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • ?
    Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • ?
    Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Similar posts