It is argued that children at school should be taught about the history of the place they were born rather than the history of the world. I strongly agree with this view for the following justifications.
The main reason why it is of greater importance for students to acknowledge of their hometown h...
Search Results 
It is more important to learn about local history than foreign history. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
- teach school student to learn more about their local history than the world history.
- It is more important for school children to learn about their local history than world history.It is argue that local history is more important than world history to learn for school students. I degree with this statement because world history contains a lot of information than local history that important for children studies, and then there are a number of famous people and artist had made ...
- It is more important for school children to learn about their local history than the world’s history.Many people have argued that school should put more focus on local history as a subject for children, rather than global history. In my opinion, I agree with this point of view, but world history, which can also bring a variety of benefits to children, should not be overlooked. On the one hand, lea...
- It is more important for schoolchildren to learn about local history than world history.It is believed by some people that children should be taught national history instead of global history. From my point of view, I disagree with those people because both of them are equally essential for young learners. On the one hand, it is unequivocal that having thorough insights into local his...
- It is more important for school children to learn local history than world history.History is a gift which is necessary to receive it so student should learn history not only of their country but also of whole world. This essay is going to discuss views in further paragraphs. To commence with, tutee should learn history because it encourages them to stay brave like their freedom f...
- It is more important for schoolchildren to learn about local history than world history.Teaching history for schoolchildren has been a heated topic constantly. There is a common belief that local history is more important to children than world history. However, I disagree with this belief. I believe the notion that local history is more valuable than world history should be rejected....
- It is more important for schoolchildren to learn about local history than world history.History is a subject that is present in most school systems and is compulsory at many levels of education. Regarding this matter, debate has been heated about the importance of teaching of local history, instead of world history to schoolchildren. In my point of view, the focus of this subject shoul...
- It is more important for schoolchildren to learn about local history them world history.Unlike the past, when pupil are interrative some knowlegde by our history story at present numberous of school and education board to one subject of our countires history whether learned world history and local history not looking at all aspects I am parially accord. This surrounded so many controve...
- Some people believe that for children learning about the local history is more important than knowing the World history. with this statement?Learning history is important because it helps us understand not only the present world but also avoid committing the mistakes of the past generations. I believe both local and world history are equally important. While local history enables children to learn about regional culture and politics, wor...
- IT IS IMPORTANT FOR SCHOOL CHILDREN TO LEARN LOCIT AL HISTORY THAN WORLD HISTORY.LOCAL HISTORYIS MORE SIGNIFICANT FOR SCHOOL LEARNERS AS CAMPARE TO INTERNATIONAL. WHILE I CONCUR WITH THIS NOTION AND THSES POINTS WILL BE ELBORATED WHY LOCAL HISTORY IS VITAL IN THE SUBSEQUENT PARAGRAPHS. HE PREDOMINANT REASON IS THAT WHY LOCAL HISTORY SHOULD BE LEARNED BY SCHOOL STUDENTS BECAUSE ...
- IT IS MORE IMPORTANT FOR STUDENTS TO STUDY INTERNATIONAL HISTORY THAN LOCAL HISTORY.History has recently become a subject of widespread concern. Some people claim that studying world history is more principal than national history. However, I believe that international history plays a more important role for students. On the one hand, students should be taught national history in ...
- IT, S IMPORTANT FOR SCHOOLCHILDREN TO LEARN ABOUT LOCAL HISTORY THAN WORL HISTORY. TO WHAT EXTANTA NUMBER OF PEOPLE BELIVE THAT SCHOOL CHILDREN SHOULD GET TO KNOW THERE PAST. BECAUSE ITS IMPORTANT FOR THEM TO GET TO KNOW ABOUT THERE PAST, HOW THERE INSESTERS USED TO SPEAK, IN LOCAL. I AGREE WITH THE QUESTION THAT CHILDREN SHOULD GET TO KNOW THERE MOTHER LANGUAGE BY BIRTH. NOW DAYS A NUMBER OF P...
- IT IS MORE IMPORTANT FOR SCHOOLCHILDREN TO LEARN ABOUT LOCAL HISTORY THAN WORLD HISTORY?It is universally acknowledged that learning history plays a crucial role in humanity, especially students. However, there are some controversial topics that the young should have an insight of their national history than the international one. From where I stand, I vividly agree with the statement ...
- It is more important for school children to learn local history rather than world historyIt is argued that learning about the past events in a homey is more vital than foreign past education. From my perspective, I totally disagree with this statement for a number of reasons. On the one hand, learning local history brings a range of benefits. First and foremost, pupil will be aware of ...
- It is more important for school children to study local history than international history. v. 1Diverging opinions have been voicing over the history syllabus for school kids in recent decades. While many advocates that world history topics should be more focused, other present arguments put forward in favor of the history of their homeland. Personally, I am of the latter idea due to two reaso...
- It is more important for school children to learn about local history than world history. v. 1There is a school of thought that learning local traditions is more essential than world history for school pupils. Nevertheless, I am in favor of the idea that it is equally important for them to study local, national and global history. On the one hand, the history of local and nation plays an ir...
- It is more important for schoolchildren to learn about local history than world history.To learn and have knowledge of our local history is a matter of pride and to gain knowledge of world history is also important to increase your general knowledge. I completely agree with the statement that in today’ era, it’s important to have knowledge about what is happening around you in your lo...
- It is more important for school children to learn about local history than world history. v. 2A common discussion among educators is about whether local history is more crucial than world history, with conflicting views on how school children would approach this issue. One opinion states that historical knowledge of the world will help prepare students for the globalized era that we are in t...
- It is more important for schoolchildren to learn about local history than world history. v. 1There is a trending argument that whether or not national history is far significant in relation to world history. In my opinion, none of these should be dominant by the other and both subjects should be well enhanced in youngster’s curriculum. Studying the history of one’s own country is surely an...
- It is more important for schoolchildren to learn about local history than world history. v. 2Teaching history for schoolchildren has been a heated topic constant. There is a common belief that local history is more important to children than world history. However, I disagree with this belief. I believe the notion that local history is more valuable than world history should be rejected. S...