Some might argue, that air travel is causing major harm to the environment in the matter of burning a tremendous amount of fossil fuel each year and depleting the world oil reserve, and demand that it should be limited. Although, it's irrefutable that flying jets cause damage to the environment, I, however, firmly disagree that it is beneficial to minimize the number of flights or restrict them. This essay addresses the reasons behind my opposition.
One significant reason to support my claim is that many government's economies depend solely on the income provided by the tourism sector which is vitally depended on the air travel. For further elaboration, in a country such as Egypt tourism industry generate more than 5 billion U. S. Dollars annually and provide more than 2 million job, naturally most of the tourists if not all come through airports, since you could travel across continents in mere hours and it has become more and more convenient means of travel nowadays, so it will impact the economy in a destructive manner if air travel was to be restricted or banned in any way. In fact, it will increase the unemployment rate exponentially, Therefore, it's really impractical economy wise to tackle this concerning issue
Another reason in favour of my opinion that many environmentalists have proven that air travel is rather friendly to the environment in comparison to other means of transportation. additionally, ground and maritime transportation means producing more than triple carbon dioxide emissions and consume way more fossil fuel than air travel. As a result, it's quite trivial to even think in making any reparations in the air travel sector before addressing the largest carbon emitters which are far more concerning to tackle.
In conclusion, even if the flight schedule globally could be minimized somehow, it is not a viable or a long term solution to tackle fossil fuel depletion or carbon dioxide emissions. Moreover, scientist must find a fossil fuel replacement in the near future.
Some
might argue, that
air
travel
is causing major harm to the environment in the matter of burning a tremendous amount of
fossil
fuel
each year and depleting the world oil reserve, and demand that it should
be limited
. Although, it's irrefutable that flying jets cause damage to the environment, I,
however
,
firmly
disagree that it is beneficial to minimize the number of flights or restrict them. This essay addresses the reasons behind my opposition.
One significant reason to support my claim is that
many
government
's economies depend
solely
on the income provided by the tourism sector which is
vitally
depended on the
air
travel
. For
further
elaboration, in a country such as Egypt tourism industry generate more than 5 billion U. S. Dollars
annually
and provide more than 2 million
job
,
naturally
most of the tourists if not all
come
through airports, since you could
travel
across continents in mere hours and it has become more and more convenient means of
travel
nowadays,
so
it will impact the economy
in a destructive manner
if
air
travel
was to
be restricted
or banned in any way. In fact, it will increase the unemployment rate
exponentially
,
Therefore
, it's
really
impractical economy wise to tackle this concerning
issue
Another reason in
favour
of my opinion that
many
environmentalists have proven that
air
travel
is
rather
friendly to the environment
in comparison
to other means of transportation.
additionally
, ground and maritime transportation means producing more than triple carbon dioxide emissions and consume way more
fossil
fuel
than
air
travel
.
As a result
, it's quite trivial to even
think
in making any reparations in the
air
travel
sector
before
addressing the largest carbon emitters which are far more concerning to tackle.
In conclusion
, even if the flight schedule globally could
be minimized
somehow, it is not a viable or a long term solution to tackle
fossil
fuel
depletion or carbon dioxide emissions.
Moreover
, scientist
must
find a
fossil
fuel
replacement in the near future.