During the recent years, the technology has improved significantly all over the world and the internet has played a considerable role in our life. There is an idea about the revolution of the world with internet in the future, which it depends on simple access to all available data through the world wide web by everyone. I however disagree with the given statement on the basis of information copyright.
To begin with, the main reason is that all of the information through internet was written by someone and should be followed copyright. So, if all the data are available and reachable without any limitation or roles, nobody respect copyright and referencing. For instance, access to the researches and photos easily and using them simply, might be trampled the author’s right. Hence, the access to the information should be follow a standard role which determines the clear rights clearly.
Having said that, however, another compelling argument against simple access to the information is personal information security. That is to say, the more technology is improving the more private hard drive is being abolished and online storage is replacing and for this purpose, restricted access is safer and logical than simple access to all data. As an example, access to the private information leads to abuse and loss of privacy which cannot be accepted by people. Thus, when the privacy policy of the internet is not acceptable by everyone it cannot alter the world dramatically.
To sum up, I personally believe that it is ethically unacceptable that the internet can revolutionize the world with easy access to the information by everyone. This is mainly because of privacy policy and copyright.
During the recent years, the technology has
improved
significantly
all over the
world
and the internet has played a considerable role in our life. There is an
idea
about the revolution of the
world
with internet in the future, which it depends on simple
access
to all available data through the
world wide web
by everyone. I
however
disagree with the
given
statement on the basis of
information
copyright.
To
begin
with, the main reason is that
all of the
information
through internet
was written
by someone and should
be followed
copyright.
So
, if all the data are available and reachable without any limitation or roles, nobody
respect
copyright and referencing.
For instance
,
access
to the researches and photos
easily
and using them
simply
, might
be trampled
the author’s right.
Hence
, the
access
to the
information
should be
follow
a standard role which determines the
clear
rights
clearly
.
Having said that,
however
, another compelling argument against simple
access
to the
information
is personal
information
security.
That is
to say, the more technology is improving the more private
hard
drive is
being abolished
and online storage is replacing and for this purpose, restricted
access
is safer and logical than simple
access
to all data. As an example,
access
to the private
information
leads to abuse and loss of privacy which cannot be
accepted
by
people
.
Thus
, when the privacy policy of the internet is not acceptable by everyone it cannot alter the
world
dramatically
.
To sum up, I
personally
believe that it is
ethically
unacceptable that the internet can revolutionize the
world
with easy
access
to the
information
by everyone. This is
mainly
because
of privacy policy and copyright.