Education is a basic human right which every child should be given opportunity to access regardless of their socioeconomic status or country of origin. Limiting children to a certain level of education based upon their background has been generating a lot of controversial arguments lately. While some people argue that pupils from low income nations should not be allowed to further their studies up to the secondary level, others are of the opinion that their status should not be used as a yardstick to deny these children of this basic right. I totally disagree with the view that children should not be denied such an opportunity.
Firstly, children are the future of a nation, it is the quality of education that they receive today that would predict the growth of the country in a few years to come. The reason is not far fetched, many people who have become professionals came to be as a result of the advanced level of education they received. For instance, sciences which are taught in school forms the basis for technological know how and innovations which we use in modern day to day activities to make life easier and better for us. This can improve living conditions.
In addition, secondary education is a stepping stone for tertiary levels. A pupil who has passed through both processes can become an entrepreneur in the future and create massive job opportunities for others, thereby solving the problem of unemployment in their country. An example of this can be found in people that are working for themselves or even working remotely and offering services to people at a cost. Secondary and tertiary education would be of benefit to this category of students.
To sum it up, I believe it is totally wrong and biased to deny children the right to advance in their career as such could kill potential talents. Rather, they should be encouraged to proceed to higher levels.
Education
is a basic human right which every child should be
given
opportunity to access regardless of their socioeconomic status or country of origin. Limiting
children
to a certain
level
of
education
based upon their background has been generating
a lot of
controversial arguments lately. While
some
people
argue that pupils from low income nations should not be
allowed
to
further
their studies up to the secondary
level
, others are of the opinion that their status should not be
used
as a yardstick to deny these
children
of this basic right. I
totally
disagree with the view that
children
should not
be denied
such an opportunity.
Firstly
,
children
are the future of a nation, it is the quality of
education
that they receive
today
that would predict the growth of the country in a few years to
come
. The reason is not
far fetched
,
many
people
who have become professionals came to be
as a result
of the advanced
level
of
education
they received.
For instance
, sciences which
are taught
in school forms the basis for technological know how and innovations which we
use
in modern
day to day
activities to
make
life easier and better for us. This can
improve
living conditions.
In addition
, secondary
education
is a stepping stone for tertiary
levels
. A pupil who has passed through both processes can become an entrepreneur in the future and create massive job opportunities for others, thereby solving the problem of unemployment in their country. An example of this can
be found
in
people
that are working for themselves or even working
remotely
and offering services to
people
at a cost. Secondary and tertiary
education
would be of benefit to this category of students.
To sum it up, I believe it is
totally
wrong
and biased to deny
children
the right to advance in their career as such could kill potential talents.
Rather
, they should
be encouraged
to proceed to higher
levels
.