Each youngster’s life starts from school subjects. They are specially organised at schools to provide literacy and basic practical skills in various areas of life. Some people believe that academic subjects grant more success in adulthood, so that non-academic subjects should be removed from school curricula. Although, academic achievements are essential, I strongly believe that non-academic subjects teach children crucial life skills and make them healthier.
Non-academic subjects give students opportunities to stay healthy by involving them into the active lifestyle better than academic disciplines. Such subjects as PE allow children to do exercise which are useful for their physical development, while academic subjects only train their intellectual work. For instance, STEM disciplines require students long-term motionless concentration on solving difficult tasks, which is hard for their brains and bodies. When switching to non-academic subjects, children are then able to concentrate on studying academic disciplines much better than if their work was all about one sort of activity.
In addition, children learn to cover their everyday needs at non-academic disciplines rather than academic ones. Every day, people perform their routine like cooking or crafting; such practical needs are important for people’s self-confidence, therefore, must be studied at schools. In many cases, non-academic disciplines provide children with a chance to train those activities in class, while academic subjects do not concentrate on implementing knowledge into everyday activity. For instance, pupils may study to deal with solutions in chemistry, but they will only learn to use those solutions in the kitchen if they study cookery. Therefore, it would be unfair to hinder children in acquiring those skills by taking away non-academic subjects from school curricula.
In conclusion, learning basic life skills and improving their physical health is vital for students to succeed in life. In this regard, I strongly disagree that non-academic subjects should be eliminated from schools. For the benefit of a student it is unlikely that making them only concentrate on academic subjects will be appropriate.
Each youngster’s
life
starts
from
school
subjects
. They are
specially
organised
at
schools
to provide literacy and basic practical
skills
in various areas of
life
.
Some
people
believe that
academic
subjects
grant more success in adulthood,
so
that non-academic
subjects
should
be removed
from
school
curricula. Although,
academic
achievements are essential, I
strongly
believe that non-academic
subjects
teach
children
crucial
life
skills
and
make
them healthier.
Non-academic
subjects
give
students
opportunities to stay healthy by involving them into the active lifestyle better than
academic
disciplines
. Such
subjects
as PE
allow
children
to do exercise which are useful for their physical development, while
academic
subjects
only
train their intellectual work.
For instance
, STEM
disciplines
require
students
long-term motionless concentration on solving difficult tasks, which is
hard
for their brains and bodies. When switching to non-academic
subjects
,
children
are then able to concentrate on studying
academic
disciplines
much better than if their work was all about one sort of activity.
In addition
,
children
learn to cover their everyday needs at non-academic
disciplines
rather
than
academic
ones. Every day,
people
perform their routine like cooking or crafting; such practical needs are
important
for
people
’s self-confidence,
therefore
,
must
be studied
at
schools
. In
many
cases, non-academic
disciplines
provide
children
with a chance to train those activities in
class
, while
academic
subjects
do not concentrate on implementing knowledge into everyday activity.
For instance
, pupils may study to deal with solutions in chemistry,
but
they will
only
learn to
use
those solutions in the kitchen if they study cookery.
Therefore
, it would be unfair to hinder
children
in acquiring those
skills
by taking away non-academic
subjects
from
school
curricula.
In conclusion
, learning basic
life
skills
and improving their physical health is vital for
students
to succeed in
life
. In this regard, I
strongly
disagree that non-academic
subjects
should
be eliminated
from
schools
. For the benefit of a
student
it is unlikely that making them
only
concentrate on
academic
subjects
will be appropriate.