Which is better for students’ education: 9-month study and 3-month break or 3-month study and 1-month break? v.2
Which is better for students’ education: 9-month study and 3-month break or 3-month study and 1-month break? v. 2
Views differ considerably when it comes to the issue of which is better time span for student’s education. Some people contend that students should attend concentrated education, while others assert that students may take part in education that has interval gaps. Both of opposite arguments appear to be somewhat convincing and stand to reason. Honestly, as for me, I agree that students should choose the education of 3-month study and 1-month break. The reasons are stated as follow.
First of all, students have less attention span and attending study for 9 months would make students severely distracted in class. The report, which established by Taiwan University, indicates that people only have 50 minutes for continuously concentrating on what they make important on. That is to say, students cannot sustain focusing on their study exceed 9 months. On the other hand, if students attend study that exceeds 9 months, they would be easily distracted by homework or other factors.
Secondly, students are lazy and attend study for so long would be too much workload for them. Take my friend Joe for example. In my university, teachers assign homework every class and ask students finishing on time, and Joe always stalls until last day. Thus, if students attend long-term classes, they must accumulate unfinished homework until the deadline. Consequently, students may finally fail to pass the course and they actually do not gain skills that teachers teach for. That is to say, students are not suited for 9 months study.
Last but not least, students care about study performance and participating in 3-months study help them developing those. For instance, people often get ideas and crucial factor when they are on vocation. To be specific, they need proper rest to inspire their brainstorming and interval break is a better choice for students. On the other hand, if students do not have appropriate rest time, they may feel tired so that they must be less creative and exhausted. As a result, students may have less study performance when they take continuous 9-months study.
To conclude, as some reasons mentioned above, I believe that students attend short-term education is better. Namely, due to distracted issue, lazy problem, and study performance, I definitely support that students participate in education: 3-month study and 1-mouth break. 
Views differ  
considerably
 when it  
comes
 to the issue of which is better time span for  
student’s
  education
.  
Some
  people
 contend that  
students
 should  
attend
 concentrated  
education
, while others assert that  
students
 may  
take part
 in  
education
 that has interval gaps. Both of opposite arguments appear to be somewhat convincing and stand to reason.  
Honestly
, as for me, I  
agree
 that  
students
 should choose the  
education
 of  
3-month
  study
 and  
1-month
 break. The reasons  
are stated
  as follow
. 
First of all
,  
students
 have less attention span and attending  
study
 for 9  
months
 would  
make
  students
  severely
 distracted in  
class
. The report, which established by Taiwan University, indicates that  
people
  only
 have 50 minutes for  
continuously
 concentrating on what they  
make
  important
 on.  
That is
 to say,  
students
 cannot sustain focusing on their  
study
 exceed 9  
months
. On the  
other
 hand, if  
students
  attend
  study
 that exceeds 9  
months
, they would be  
easily
 distracted by homework or  
other
 factors. 
Secondly
,  
students
 are lazy and  
attend
  study
 for  
so
 long would be too much workload for them. Take my friend Joe  
for example
. In my university, teachers assign homework every  
class
 and ask  
students
 finishing on time, and Joe always stalls until last day.  
Thus
, if  
students
  attend
 long-term classes, they  
must
 accumulate unfinished homework until the deadline.  
Consequently
,  
students
 may  
finally
 fail to pass the  
course and
 they actually do not gain  
skills
 that teachers teach for.  
That is
 to say,  
students
 are not suited for 9  
months
 study.
Last  
but
 not least,  
students
 care about  
study
 performance and participating in  
3-months
  study
  help
 them  
developing
 those.  
For instance
,  
people
  often
  get
  ideas
 and crucial factor when they are on vocation. To be specific, they need proper rest to inspire their brainstorming and interval break is a better choice for  
students
. On the  
other
 hand, if  
students
 do not have appropriate rest time, they may feel tired  
so
 that they  
must
 be less creative and exhausted.  
As a result
,  
students
 may have less  
study
 performance when they take continuous  
9-months
 study. 
To conclude
, as  
some
 reasons mentioned above, I believe that  
students
  attend
 short-term  
education
 is better.  
Namely
, due to distracted issue, lazy problem, and  
study
 performance, I definitely support that  
students
 participate in  
education
:  
3-month
  study
 and 1-mouth break. 
15Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
52Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
4Mistakes