Many believed artificially intelligent robots will soon take over most jobs from human beings. While the robots’ ability might fit well for most repetitive jobs, it is difficult to replace jobs that require human creativity with the A. I. This essay will discuss why our creativity at work is difficult for AI to imitate in certain occupations.
For duties requiring a same standard, the artificial robots might be better candidates than the humans. Robots can be programmed to execute repetitive motions which make them a perfect task force of production to meet strict quality controls. For instance, in Japanese catering industry, most procedures in fast food production are operated by the machines, thus the taste and outlook of each frozen meals are all identical. Therefore, it is foreseeable that many of the similar tasks could be delivered by robots instead.
In contrast, jobs that involve human creation might be difficult for machines to perform. Human’s ability in perceiving and expressing news ideas are unique; it cannot be duplicated by programming. Great authors touched hearts of millions by observing the humanity and deliver in a story; artists communicate with their audience by paintings or sculptures and the emotion resonates with our hearts. Even if we programme robots with the most versatile vocabularies or the best art-crafting techniques, robots could not produce masterpieces like “Crime and Punishment” or “Starry Night”. That is the reason why in some aspects machines could never win over human beings.
To conclude, robots are expected to become dominant in jobs in specific areas. Robots are highly qualified for repetitive labouring; whereas jobs that require imagination might not be at robots’ expertise. Ultimately, few occupations might still be safe from robots’ seizure comparing to the major robot employment in the future.
Many
believed
artificially
intelligent robots will
soon
take over most
jobs
from
human
beings. While the robots’ ability
might
fit well for most repetitive
jobs
, it is difficult to replace
jobs
that require
human
creativity with the A. I. This essay will discuss why our creativity at work is difficult for AI to imitate in certain occupations.
For duties requiring a same standard, the artificial robots
might
be better candidates than the
humans
. Robots can
be programmed
to execute repetitive motions which
make
them a perfect task force of production to
meet
strict quality controls.
For instance
, in Japanese catering industry, most procedures in
fast
food production
are operated
by the machines,
thus
the taste and outlook of each frozen meals are all identical.
Therefore
, it is foreseeable that
many
of the similar tasks could
be delivered
by robots
instead
.
In contrast
,
jobs
that involve
human
creation
might
be difficult for machines to perform.
Human’s
ability in perceiving and expressing news
ideas
are unique; it cannot
be duplicated
by programming. Great authors touched hearts of millions by observing the humanity and deliver in a story; artists communicate with their audience by paintings or sculptures and the emotion resonates with our hearts. Even if we
programme
robots with the most versatile vocabularies or the best art-crafting techniques, robots could not produce masterpieces like “Crime and Punishment” or “Starry Night”.
That is
the reason why in
some
aspects machines could never win over
human
beings.
To conclude
, robots are
expected
to become dominant in
jobs
in specific areas. Robots are
highly
qualified for repetitive
labouring
; whereas
jobs
that require imagination
might
not be at robots’ expertise.
Ultimately
, few occupations
might
still
be safe from robots’ seizure comparing to the major robot employment in the future.
7.5Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
7.5Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
7.5Mistakes