Many believed artificially intelligent robots will soon take over most jobs from human beings. While the robots’ ability might fit well for most repetitive jobs, it is difficult to replace jobs that require human creativity with the A. I. This essay will discuss why our creativity at work is difficult for AI to imitate in certain occupations.
For duties requiring a same standard, the artificial robots might be better candidates than the humans. Robots can be programmed to execute repetitive motions which make them a perfect task force of production to meet strict quality controls. For instance, in Japanese catering industry, most procedures in fast food production are operated by the machines, thus the taste and outlook of each frozen meals are all identical. Therefore, it is foreseeable that many of the similar tasks could be delivered by robots instead.
In contrast, jobs that involve human creation might be difficult for machines to perform. Human’s ability in perceiving and expressing news ideas are unique; it cannot be duplicated by programming. Great authors touched hearts of millions by observing the humanity and deliver in a story; artists communicate with their audience by paintings or sculptures and the emotion resonates with our hearts. Even if we programme robots with the most versatile vocabularies or the best art-crafting techniques, robots could not produce masterpieces like “Crime and Punishment” or “Starry Night”. That is the reason why in some aspects machines could never win over human beings.
To conclude, robots are expected to become dominant in jobs in specific areas. Robots are highly qualified for repetitive labouring; whereas jobs that require imagination might not be at robots’ expertise. Ultimately, few occupations might still be safe from robots’ seizure comparing to the major robot employment in the future. 
 Many
 believed  
artificially
 intelligent robots will  
soon
 take over most  
jobs
 from  
human
 beings. While the robots’ ability  
might
 fit well for most repetitive  
jobs
, it is difficult to replace  
jobs
 that require  
human
 creativity with the A. I. This essay will discuss why our creativity at work is difficult for AI to imitate in certain occupations.
For duties requiring a same standard, the artificial robots  
might
 be better candidates than the  
humans
. Robots can  
be programmed
 to execute repetitive motions which  
make
 them a perfect task force of production to  
meet
 strict quality controls.  
For instance
, in Japanese catering industry, most procedures in  
fast
 food production  
are operated
 by the machines,  
thus
 the taste and outlook of each frozen meals are all identical.  
Therefore
, it is foreseeable that  
many
 of the similar tasks could  
be delivered
 by robots  
instead
. 
In contrast
,  
jobs
 that involve  
human
 creation  
might
 be difficult for machines to perform.  
Human’s
 ability in perceiving and expressing news  
ideas
 are unique; it cannot  
be duplicated
 by programming. Great authors touched hearts of millions by observing the humanity and deliver in a story; artists communicate with their audience by paintings or sculptures and the emotion resonates with our hearts. Even if we  
programme
 robots with the most versatile vocabularies or the best art-crafting techniques, robots could not produce masterpieces like “Crime and Punishment” or “Starry Night”.  
That is
 the reason why in  
some
 aspects machines could never win over  
human
 beings. 
To conclude
, robots are  
expected
 to become dominant in  
jobs
 in specific areas. Robots are  
highly
 qualified for repetitive  
labouring
; whereas  
jobs
 that require imagination  
might
 not be at robots’ expertise.  
Ultimately
, few occupations  
might
  still
 be safe from robots’ seizure comparing to the major robot employment in the future. 
 7.5Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
7.5Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
7.5Mistakes