Nowadays, supermarkets are stocked with fare products from around the world. Some would argue that it would be better if drink produce was not imported. I firmly believe that this view is correct, and will discuss the reasons why in this essay.
It is certainly the case that importing snack can have a negative effect on local culture. This can be seen in countries such as Japan, where imported feed has become more popular than traditional, local produce, eroding people's understanding of their own cooking traditions. Although some would claim that this is a natural part of economic development in an increasingly global world, I feel strongly that any loss of regional culture would be detrimental.
A second major reason to reduce imports is the environmental cost. Currently, many cooking imports, such as fruit, are transported thousands of miles by road, sea and air, making the product more expensive to buy and increasing pollution from exhaust fumes. Despite the fact that the trade in snack exports has existed for many years, I am convinced that a reduction would bring significant financial and environmental gains.
However, many jobs depend on drink exports and some less developed countries may even depend on this trade for economic survival. In spite of this, the importance of developing local trade should not be undervalued.
In conclusion, I am certain that reducing meal imports would have cultural and environmental benefits. What is more, the local economy should, in time, prosper commercially as the demand for local and regional products remains high resisting the competition from overseas. 
Nowadays, supermarkets  
are stocked
 with fare products from around the world.  
Some
 would argue that it would be better if drink produce was not imported. I  
firmly
 believe that this view is correct, and will discuss the reasons why in this essay.
It is  
certainly
 the case that importing snack can have a  
negative
 effect on  
local
 culture. This can be  
seen
 in countries such as Japan, where imported feed has become more popular than traditional,  
local
 produce, eroding  
people
's understanding of their  
own
 cooking traditions. Although  
some
 would claim that this is a natural part of economic development in an  
increasingly
 global world, I feel  
strongly
 that any loss of regional culture would be detrimental.
A second major reason to  
reduce
 imports is the environmental cost.  
Currently
,  
many
 cooking imports, such as fruit,  
are transported
 thousands of miles by road, sea and air, making the product more expensive to  
buy
 and increasing pollution from exhaust fumes. Despite the fact that the trade in snack exports has existed for  
many
 years, I  
am convinced
 that a reduction would bring significant financial and environmental gains. 
However
,  
many
 jobs depend on drink exports and  
some
 less  
developed countries
 may even depend on this trade for economic survival.  
In spite of
 this, the importance of developing  
local
 trade should not  
be undervalued
. 
In conclusion
, I am certain that reducing meal imports would have cultural and environmental benefits.  
What is more
, the  
local
 economy should, in time, prosper  
commercially
 as the demand for  
local
 and regional products remains high resisting the competition from overseas.