Work attire is equally important as the quality of work in many companies. Organisations want their employees to dress professionally, however, others consider, work quality being ultimately superior to appearance. This essay will discuss both views and provide my opinions regarding the same.
Employees are obliged to follow a strict dress code in companies to look presentable. Clothing is always linked to class and there are several stereotypes attached to a particular dressing style, hence it is important for employees to not intimidate customers from approaching them. For example, a survey done among US citizens indicates that people of low maintenance and tattoos are considered non-approachable, compared to employees wearing formal attire. Therefore, I consider that companies encourage their employees to wear formal wears to increase their brand value by being more presentable.
However, there are many multinational companies and startups which promote casual wears as they value the quality of work and productivity over appearance. Apparently, a number of companies, believe in the comfort of their employees and focus on productivity. It creates a positive atmosphere for working and makes employees in charge of their options. For example, companies like Google and Microsoft do not have a dress code which gives a sense of freedom and positive vibe among their staffs. Meanwhile, focusing on quality is indeed obvious on their revenue. From my perspective, the appearance of an employee should not be an issue as far as their work is concerned.
To conclude, the value of employee should be assessed by their work and not by their looks as long as workers are not wearing a dress that is appropriate, such as revealing clothes, the sole focus should be on the quality of work. Minimal restrictions on dressing style can enhance a positive mindset among workers, which further helps in productivity.
Work
attire is
equally
important
as the
quality
of
work
in
many
companies
.
Organisations
want their
employees
to
dress
professionally
,
however
, others consider,
work
quality
being
ultimately
superior to appearance. This essay will discuss both views and provide my opinions regarding the same.
Employees
are obliged
to follow a strict
dress
code in
companies
to look presentable. Clothing is always linked to
class
and there are several stereotypes attached to a particular dressing style,
hence
it is
important
for
employees
to not intimidate customers from approaching them.
For example
, a survey done among US citizens indicates that
people
of low maintenance and tattoos
are considered
non-approachable, compared to
employees
wearing formal attire.
Therefore
, I consider that
companies
encourage their
employees
to wear formal wears to increase their brand value by being more presentable.
However
, there are
many
multinational
companies
and startups which promote casual wears as they value the
quality
of
work
and productivity over appearance.
Apparently
, a number of
companies
, believe in the comfort of their
employees
and focus on productivity. It creates a
positive
atmosphere for working and
makes
employees
in charge of their options.
For example
,
companies
like Google and Microsoft do not have a
dress
code which gives a sense of freedom and
positive
vibe among their staffs. Meanwhile, focusing on
quality
is
indeed
obvious on their revenue. From my perspective, the appearance of an
employee
should not be an issue as far as their
work
is concerned
.
To conclude
, the value of
employee
should
be assessed
by their
work
and not by their looks as long as workers are not wearing a
dress
that is
appropriate, such as revealing clothes, the sole focus should be on the
quality
of
work
. Minimal restrictions on dressing style can enhance a
positive
mindset among workers, which
further
helps
in productivity.