Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

TPO (S7-Q2): Learning through online courses is more effective than learning in traditional classroom setting. v.1

TPO (S7-Q2): Learning through online courses is more effective than learning in traditional classroom setting. v. 1
One of the most topical issues in modern society is animal testing. It is often said that animal testing is crucial and unethical, however, others believe that it should be banned. In this easy, I will discuss both sides of the contentious controversy. Generally speaking, there is a wide range of reasons why people believe that we must do tests on animals. Perhaps the main reason why people in favour of this trend is that it is the best way to research, analysis and observe effects of different medicine. For example, before promising drugs, vaccines or treatment is used on humans, it needs to be tested on animals in order to establish its safety. This practice has many a time-proven not only effective, but has saved lives. In addition, the animals which are used are not usually savage, but are bred especially for experimenting purpose. Therefore, it’s not true that animal tests are responsible for reducing the number of animal species. However, animal testing is necessary to protect human lives and reduce harm. Despite these arguments, there are more convincing arguments against this. The primary reason is that testing and experiment on animals are cruel and unkind, which cause a lot of pain, even death. For example, when we push injection on animal body, it will hurt them like we feel. In addition, there are many tests are not really important, and in fact, animals are not only used to test a new medicine but also cosmetics, which could be tested on humans instead. Finally, sometimes an experiment on animals gives us the wrong result because animals’ bodies are not exactly the same as our own. However, if we continue the experiment on animals, this will probably become terrible and questioned. In conclusion, it must be said that this has become a complex issue with no solution. Having both sides of the viewpoints I would argue that medical research, prevention of harms and eradication of diseases are valid to continue animal testing. However, inflecting cruelty on living creatures just for the sake of beauty like cosmetics research is not only unnecessary but also inexcusable.
One of the most topical issues in modern society is
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animal
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
testing
. It is
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
often
said that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animal
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
testing
is crucial and unethical,
however
, others believe that it should
be banned
. In this easy, I will discuss both sides of the contentious controversy.

Generally
speaking, there is a wide range of reasons why
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
believe that we
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
must
do
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
tests
on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
. Perhaps the main reason why
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
in
Possible spelling mistake. 'favour' is British English.
favour
of this trend is that it is the best way to research, analysis and observe effects of
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
different
medicine.
For example
,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
before
promising drugs, vaccines or treatment is
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
used
on humans, it needs to be
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
tested
on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
in order to establish its safety. This practice has
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
a time-proven not
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
effective,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
has saved
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
lives
.
In addition
, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
which are
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
used
are not
usually
savage,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
are bred
especially
for experimenting purpose.
Therefore
, it’s not true that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animal
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
tests
are responsible for reducing the number of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animal
species.
However
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animal
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
testing
is necessary to protect human
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
lives
and
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
reduce
harm.

Despite these arguments, there are more convincing arguments against this. The primary reason is that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
testing
and experiment on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
are cruel and unkind, which cause
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
a lot of
pain, even death.
For example
, when we push injection on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animal
body, it will hurt them like we feel.
In addition
, there are
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
tests
are not
really
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
important
, and in fact,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
are not
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
used
to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
test
a new medicine
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
also
cosmetics, which could be
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
tested
on humans
instead
.
Finally
,
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
sometimes
an experiment on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
gives us the
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
wrong
result
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals’
bodies are not exactly the same as our
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
own
.
However
, if we continue the experiment on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
, this will
probably
become terrible and questioned.

In conclusion
, it
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
must
be said
that this has become a complex issue with no solution. Having both sides of the viewpoints I would argue that medical research, prevention of harms and eradication of diseases are valid to continue
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animal
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
testing
.
However
, inflecting cruelty on living creatures
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
just
for the sake of beauty like cosmetics research is not
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
unnecessary
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
also
inexcusable.
7Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
7Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
7Mistakes

IELTS essay TPO (S7-Q2): Learning through online courses is more effective than learning in traditional classroom setting. v. 1

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
354 words
7.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 7.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 7.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 7.0
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 7.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Similar posts


Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • TPO (S7-Q2): Learning through online courses is more effective than learning in traditional classroom setting. v.1