By and large, beyond doubt, it is established that knowing about the country or other important events in the past has so many benefits for us. But some, including I, think it strongly depends on the student to be interested in the history or not. Therefor making the history a procrustean course, I believe will follow with lots of arguments. In the following, I will delve into some of the conspicuous reasons to substantiate my point of view on this issue.
The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that imposing convictions to people has always been followed by the influences in contrast with what we expect. University is a level of education that students are able to follow their interests there should not be a force for spending time and effort on fields that students don' t have any desire to have information about. In addition, I want to include my own experience, in my country, it is a force that all students from all the majors should take some courses about the history, and some fields about religious and so on. Due to the courses being imposed, I utterly hate them and have never been listening to the teachers. I can confidently say that near 890% of the students are the same as I.
The other subtle point to be mentioned is that not all of the students have foundings and scholarships, most of them pay heavy tuitions for the university and making their burden heavier with such courses that are no use for them doesn' t look like an appropriate scheme. Furthermore, the money university spends for gathering the amenities a class requires is a cost that is waste. By the amenities I mean human resources to schedule the class, a professor to teach the course and some resources to clean the class weekly for students. Although spending these resources for other projects in the university will bring up and followed with more satisfaction from the students. For instance, building some yards or changing the old materials that are being used and alternating them with the better functional ones.
Last reason that worth some words here is that, sometimes when people are forces o unfavorable things scientific research claim that they show some insulting behaviors toward the people who had made the decision or the others we think are the reason of that misery. Hence, the university and the professors should be expecting some inappropriate and dire behavior from students. Personally talking there always have been some students in our history classes that had issues with the teacher which has been uncomfortable for both the teacher and the other students.
Due the aforementioned ground, the policy of making students care about the unnecessary convictions of people in past is not the adequate scheme if the goal is that students know about the latter eras. To put in briefly, contemplating from all the factors and the reasons I believe taking history courses should be an option for the ones that aspire to know about it not a force for all of the students.
By and large, beyond doubt, it
is established
that knowing about the country or
other
important
events
in the past has
so
many
benefits for us.
But
some
, including I,
think
it
strongly
depends on the
student
to
be interested
in the
history
or not. Therefor making the
history
a
procrustean
course
, I believe will follow with lots of arguments. In the following, I will delve into
some of the
conspicuous
reasons
to substantiate my point of view on this issue.
The
first
exquisite point to
be mentioned
is that imposing convictions to
people
has
always
been followed
by the influences
in contrast
with what we
expect
.
University
is a level of education that
students
are able to follow their interests there should not be a
force
for spending time and effort on fields that
students
don&
#039; t have any desire to have information about.
In addition
, I want to include my
own
experience, in my country, it is a
force
that all
students
from all the majors should take
some
courses
about the
history
, and
some
fields about religious and
so
on. Due to the
courses
being imposed
, I
utterly
hate them and have never been listening to the teachers. I can
confidently
say that near 890% of the
students
are the same as I.
The
other
subtle point to
be mentioned
is that not
all of the
students
have
foundings
and scholarships, most of them pay heavy
tuitions
for the
university
and making their burden heavier with such
courses
that are no
use
for them
doesn&
#039; t look like an appropriate scheme.
Furthermore
, the money
university
spends for gathering the amenities a
class
requires is a cost
that is
waste. By the amenities I mean human resources to schedule the
class
, a professor to teach the
course
and
some
resources to clean the
class
weekly for
students
. Although spending these resources for
other
projects in the
university
will bring up and followed with more satisfaction from the
students
.
For instance
, building
some
yards or changing the
old
materials that are being
used
and alternating them with the better functional ones.
Last
reason
that worth
some
words here is that,
sometimes
when
people
are
forces
o unfavorable things scientific research claim that they
show
some
insulting behaviors toward the
people
who had made the decision or the others we
think
are the
reason
of that misery.
Hence
, the
university
and the professors should be expecting
some
inappropriate and dire behavior from
students
.
Personally
talking there always have been
some
students
in our
history
classes
that had issues with the teacher which has been uncomfortable for both the teacher and the
other
students.
Due the
aforementioned ground, the policy of making
students
care about the unnecessary convictions of
people
in past is not the adequate scheme if the goal is that
students
know about the latter eras. To put in
briefly
, contemplating from all the factors and the
reasons
I believe taking
history
courses
should be an option for the ones that aspire to know about it not a
force
for
all of the
students
.