It is a controversial issue as to whether governments ought to focus on buying faster public transport, or, whether they should spend revenue on other sectors such as living cost and environment. From my perspective, authorities must balance their spending in both sectors, because cost of living and environs are as important as public vehicles.
To begin with, the speediness in transports for the public is essential, since citizens want comfort and convenience in reaching their destined places. This is because the public does not want to wait long hours to reach, such as offices, universities, and shops so that they want speed in cars, buses, motor vehicles, to name but a few. If transports take a long time to go any places, it hampers working activities of the public. For example, in Bangladesh, 95% of total conveyance are slow, which creates hassles in rush hours, consequently, officers get less salaries for being late at offices or most of the time students are absent in the first hour class. Therefore, authorities must allocate some money from taxpayers to invest in buying faster means of transports.
On the other hand, governments must spend a good amount of money since citizens are also struggling with financing living expenses; besides the inhabitant of people are not eco-friendly. These two issues should be resolved by the bureaucrats of a country. To counter this menace, to illustrate, in the USA, the most significant step taken by the government is that it separates money, at least 49% of the total GDP, which helps the common people to spend less amount of money in living, whereas as the government provides funds in research teams who tend to reduce pollution dramatically on soil, air, and water, the public of this country is living healthier lives.
In conclusion, although people think that only spending more on buying faster conveyance would solve the problem, other issues like the cost of living and the ambiance which has been polluted, should also be handled by authorities by investing revenue in it. In my opinion, investing funds in living and environs sectors should be similar to providing money on bringing faster cars at home.
It is a controversial issue
as to whether
governments
ought to focus on buying
faster
public
transport, or, whether they should spend revenue on other sectors such as
living
cost and environment. From my perspective, authorities
must
balance their spending in both sectors,
because
cost of
living
and environs are as
important
as
public
vehicles.
To
begin
with, the speediness in transports for the
public
is essential, since citizens want comfort and convenience in reaching their destined places. This is
because
the
public
does not want to wait long hours to reach, such as offices, universities, and shops
so
that they want speed in cars, buses, motor vehicles, to name
but
a few. If transports take a long time to go any places, it hampers working activities of the
public
.
For example
, in Bangladesh, 95% of total conveyance are slow, which creates hassles in rush hours,
consequently
, officers
get
less
salaries for being late at offices or most of the time students are absent in the
first
hour
class
.
Therefore
, authorities
must
allocate
some
money
from taxpayers to invest in buying
faster
means of transports.
On the other hand
,
governments
must
spend a
good
amount of
money
since citizens are
also
struggling with financing
living
expenses;
besides
the inhabitant of
people
are not eco-friendly. These two issues should
be resolved
by the bureaucrats of a country. To counter this menace, to illustrate, in the USA, the most significant step taken by the
government
is that it separates
money
, at least 49% of the total GDP, which
helps
the common
people
to spend less amount of
money
in
living
, whereas as the
government
provides funds in research teams who tend to
reduce
pollution
dramatically
on soil, air, and water, the
public
of this country is
living
healthier
lives
.
In conclusion
, although
people
think
that
only
spending more on buying
faster
conveyance would solve the problem, other issues like the cost of
living
and the ambiance which has
been polluted
, should
also
be handled
by authorities by investing revenue in it. In my opinion, investing funds in
living
and environs sectors should be similar to providing
money
on bringing
faster
cars at home.