It is the choice that people make between good and popular. Some people love to be associated with their famous figures, such as sports persons, comedians, actors, and others. However, there is a school of thought which believes that contributions of scientists are as well as other popular figures. This essay takes a neutral stance on both types of heroes.
There are several reasons why the contributions of great scientists cannot be ignored, to begin with. Humankind has evolved from an early primitive stage to the glitter of this modern world. Scientists have strived untiringly to make our life easier and comfortable in every walk of life. For example, we would have been roaming to hunt animals to feed ourselves and died this way had there been no inventions or innovations. Furthermore, scientists are instrumental in making this world a better place to live.
On the flip side, entertainers have a different role to play when compared. Our day-to-day life works on happiness, passion, emotion, stress, and other psychological triggers. These entertainers give a reason for a smile on the face. People are stressed from their nine-to-five jobs, and they find solace and blitheness when they watch their entertainers doing their roles.
In my opinion, it is a battle between popularity and good. Entertainers are closer to the hearts of people as they are generally more covered on television, the internet, newspapers, and magazines. While scientists live with us daily, but they are hidden and unidentified behind the curtains. A classic example is that the youth gravitate more to Tom Cruise than Albert Einstein.
In conclusion, it is indeed entertainers are more remembered and loved than scientists. Both have specific roles in our lives, but the latter is, at times, unfortunate to receive the lesser honour and recognition in society.
It is the choice that
people
make
between
good
and popular.
Some
people
love
to
be associated
with their
famous
figures, such as sports persons, comedians, actors,
and others
.
However
, there is a school of
thought
which believes that contributions of
scientists
are
as well
as other popular figures. This essay takes a neutral stance on both types of heroes.
There are several reasons why the contributions of great
scientists
cannot be
ignored
, to
begin
with. Humankind has evolved from an early primitive stage to the glitter of this modern world.
Scientists
have strived
untiringly
to
make
our life easier and comfortable in every walk of life.
For example
, we would have been roaming to hunt animals to feed ourselves and
died
this way had there been no inventions or innovations.
Furthermore
,
scientists
are instrumental in making this world a better place to
live
.
On the flip side,
entertainers
have a
different
role to play when compared. Our day-to-day life works on happiness, passion, emotion,
stress
, and other psychological triggers. These
entertainers
give a reason for a smile on the face.
People
are
stressed
from their nine-to-five jobs, and they find solace and blitheness when they
watch
their
entertainers
doing their roles.
In my opinion, it is a battle between popularity and
good
.
Entertainers
are closer to the hearts of
people
as they are
generally
more covered on television, the internet, newspapers, and magazines. While
scientists
live
with us daily,
but
they
are hidden
and unidentified behind the curtains. A classic example is that the youth gravitate more to Tom Cruise than Albert Einstein.
In conclusion
, it is
indeed
entertainers
are more remembered and
loved
than
scientists
. Both have specific roles in our
lives
,
but
the latter is, at times, unfortunate to receive the lesser
honour
and recognition in society.