It is considered by most individuals that government should provide free of cost commuting facilities to the ordinary people in the metropolitan cities. Although the administration of the country will have to face certain problems pertaining to the maintenance of vehicles, it would encourage the use of public services among the citizens of the nation.
To begin with, if the administration does not charge masses for using public amenities, such as buses and trains, a large part of the population will get motivated to take advantage of these modes of travel. Furthermore, traffic jams and gridlocks on roads would reduce to a substantial extent. For instance, in the capital city of my country India, Delhi, a major part of the population commute to their workstations by private vehicles, which has enhanced the congestion on the roads. By implementation of this rule current situation can be tackled to a vast level.
On the other hand, this situation would be quite cumbersome for the authorities. Since due to lack of funds our administration will not be able to improve these facilities, they do not find themselves capable of improving and modifying travelling means. This is because the central power relies completely on the public funds for any improvement. For instance, most of the rent, that is collected from selling the tickets, is used in modification and amendment of transport modes, but free accessibility to the use of these services means no income for the government. In short, transportation department suffers from huge loss in the deficiency of money.
To conclude, there is some segment of the population that is in favour of accessing free means of travel. Despite having their agreement in order to promote such modes, the demerits of losses to the governing bodies cannot be denied.
It
is considered
by most individuals that
government
should provide free of cost commuting facilities to the ordinary
people
in the metropolitan cities. Although the administration of the country will
have to
face certain problems pertaining to the maintenance of vehicles, it would encourage the
use
of public services among the citizens of the nation.
To
begin
with, if the administration does not charge masses for using public amenities, such as buses and trains, a large part of the population will
get
motivated to take advantage of these modes of travel.
Furthermore
, traffic jams and gridlocks on roads would
reduce
to a substantial extent.
For instance
, in the capital city of my country India, Delhi, a major part of the population commute to their workstations by private vehicles, which has enhanced the congestion on the roads. By implementation of this
rule
current
situation can
be tackled
to a vast level.
On the other hand
, this situation would be quite cumbersome for the authorities. Since due to lack of funds our administration will not be able to
improve
these facilities, they do not find themselves capable of improving and modifying travelling means. This is
because
the central power relies completely on the public funds for any improvement.
For instance
, most of the rent, that
is collected
from selling the tickets, is
used
in modification and amendment of transport modes,
but
free accessibility to the
use
of these services means no income for the
government
. In short, transportation department suffers from huge loss in the deficiency of money.
To conclude
, there is
some
segment of the population
that is
in
favour
of accessing free means of travel. Despite having their agreement in order to promote such modes, the demerits of losses to the governing bodies cannot
be denied
.