People’s physical strength deteriorates with aging. Therefore, one school of thought avers that, it not wises to fix the retirement age of all the professionals, since different fields require different energy level. I concur with the statement and, in following paragraphs I will discuss the arguments in detail with examples.
In certain occupations, employees have to put their lives in danger to complete the tasks. These jobs can execute successfully only when workers are strong both physically and mentally, however after forties people not only become weaker, but also would have ample minor diseases which could disrupt them to perform their duties. If these employees still continue their job, it would be risky for them and companies. To illustrate, due to a dearth of energy they would work gradually which affect the productivity and profit or maybe lost their lives while performing hazard mission. Therefore, these workers should be retired after forties and, state must bestow them pension so that they do not face any financial obstacles.
There are certain types of jobs where people deserve to retire early. One of them is a mini, where people have to work in mines which are more than 200 feet below the ground with extreme temperature and limited oxygen. Another occupation is service in the armed forces, where soldiers must have robust strength, mental power and deadly. This is because many times they have to deal with extremely hazardous conditions such as combat with enemies without having food or water for a week. Therefore, these workers should be retired earlier than other professionals such as bankers.
On the whole, fixing retirement age for all occupations would cause problems for employees and employers. Therefore, it should be flexible for certain occupations with all benefits.
People’s
physical strength deteriorates with aging.
Therefore
, one school of
thought
avers that, it not wises to
fix
the retirement age of all the professionals, since
different
fields require
different
energy level. I concur with the statement and, in following paragraphs I will discuss the arguments in detail with examples.
In certain
occupations
, employees
have to
put their
lives
in
danger
to complete the tasks. These jobs can execute
successfully
only
when workers are strong both
physically
and mentally,
however
after forties
people
not
only
become weaker,
but
also
would have ample minor diseases which could disrupt them to perform their duties. If these employees
still
continue their job, it would be risky for them and
companies
. To illustrate, due to a dearth of energy they would work
gradually
which affect the productivity and profit or maybe lost their
lives
while performing hazard mission.
Therefore
, these workers should
be retired
after forties and, state
must
bestow them pension
so
that they do not face any financial obstacles.
There are certain types of jobs where
people
deserve to retire early. One of them is a mini, where
people
have to
work in mines which are more than
200 feet
below the ground with extreme temperature and limited oxygen. Another
occupation
is service in the armed forces, where soldiers
must
have robust strength, mental power and deadly. This is
because
many
times they
have to
deal with
extremely
hazardous conditions such as combat with enemies without having food or water for a week.
Therefore
, these workers should
be retired
earlier than other professionals such as bankers.
On the whole
, fixing retirement age for all
occupations
would cause problems for employees and employers.
Therefore
, it should be flexible for certain
occupations
with all benefits.