It is considered by some that preserving and maintaining local culture are attained by prohibiting tourism in some areas, whereas others believe that change is unavoidable and banning tourism will not lead to any benefit. I believe that although tourism is a reasonably reliable industry to many countries, certain laws and regulations should be implemented to protect local culture and traditions.
On the one hand, some argue that banning tourism is the ultimate way to help conserve local culture. Firstly, tourism pose a real threat to traditional practices. In other words, locals might get highly influenced by the tourists' habits, perspectives, traditions, and even their language. Hence, native people will resort to foreign language to communicate effectively, which will result eventually in the dominance of this language. Secondly, building infrastructures and facilities, namely hotels can lead sometimes to the displacement of indigenous citizens from their homes.
On the other hand, banning tourism will have a detrimental impact on the local economy. Tourism, industry on which many countries rely on, can maintain a significant influx of money. Tourists spend a lot of money on their accommodation, transport and dining. Consequently, this will boost local economies and create a a multitude of job opportunities. Moreover, travel enhances the profile of certain areas in the world. A typical example, some natural sacred spots might become tourist destination which will ensure a worldwide recognition for this community.
In conclusion, introducing certain regulations to mitigate the negative impacts of tourism oncommunities' cultures instead of its ban is the best approach.
It
is considered
by
some
that preserving and maintaining
local
culture
are attained
by prohibiting
tourism
in
some
areas, whereas others believe that
change
is unavoidable and banning
tourism
will not lead to any benefit. I believe that although
tourism
is a
reasonably
reliable industry to
many
countries, certain laws and regulations should
be implemented
to protect
local
culture
and traditions.
On the one hand,
some
argue that banning
tourism
is the ultimate way to
help
conserve
local
culture
.
Firstly
,
tourism
pose a real threat to traditional practices.
In other words
,
locals
might
get
highly
influenced by the tourists' habits, perspectives, traditions, and even their language.
Hence
, native
people
will resort to foreign language to communicate
effectively
, which will result
eventually
in the dominance of this language.
Secondly
, building infrastructures and facilities,
namely
hotels can lead
sometimes
to the displacement of indigenous citizens from their homes.
On the other hand
, banning
tourism
will have a detrimental impact on the
local
economy.
Tourism
, industry on which
many
countries rely on, can maintain a significant influx of money. Tourists spend
a lot of
money on their accommodation, transport and dining.
Consequently
, this will boost
local
economies and create
a a
multitude of job opportunities.
Moreover
, travel enhances the profile of certain areas in the world. A typical example,
some
natural sacred spots might become tourist destination which will ensure a worldwide recognition for this community.
In conclusion
, introducing certain regulations to mitigate the
negative
impacts of
tourism
oncommunities
'
cultures
instead
of its ban is the best approach.