In order to use public transportation as a compulsory means for travel, ban personal vehicles is considered as the best choice for government. Although this measure may work well for this purpose, some problems are triggered by this method is inevitable.
Public transports, which leads to a better environment is just created by the unanimity of the whole society. To get the consensus of every individual in the society, the regulation for the public transit using is necessary. Therefore, the ban of personal transports: private cars or private moto bikes are the reasonable method which orients people to use public transports also reduces the gas emission. For instant, Singapore, which reduces its greenhouse gas released because of the rise of using public transits, is one of the cleanest cities in the world. Additionally, because of the reduction in gas release, the environment receives a better air condition. Subsequently, the whole society changes the transport-used habits will be overwhelming if there is a lack of a heaviness compulsory measure towards personal transports.
Nevertheless, the ban on personal means of movement apparently violates the privacy and freedom as well as causes inconvenience to people’s movement. Obviously, the compulsory transportation will violate the privacy and freedom of a human which are basic needs of each human according to Maslow’s needs hierarchy, clearly regulates in the civil law of each nation. Furthermore, this infringement also results in the inconvenient travel. Despite the government can plan very detailed transporting schedule for the public transport system, they still do not customize the schedule to each individual’s needs. Thus, the conflict between the real needs of users and the travel schedule of the public means is apparently unavoidable.
In conclusion, the compulsory towards personal transports, which may appear as a good measure to encourage the whole nation use the public transports, may infringe to the privacy and freedom of the people. Hence, instead of forcing people, the government should spend a relative budget to educate people about the detrimental effects of personal transports and improve the public transport system beforehand.
In order to
use
public
transportation as a
compulsory
means for travel, ban
personal
vehicles
is considered
as the best choice for
government
. Although this measure may work well for this purpose,
some
problems
are triggered
by this method is inevitable.
Public
transports
, which leads to a better environment is
just
created by the unanimity of the whole society. To
get
the consensus of every individual in the society, the regulation for the
public
transit using is necessary.
Therefore
, the ban of
personal
transports
: private cars or private
moto
bikes are the reasonable method which orients
people
to
use
public
transports
also
reduces
the gas emission. For instant, Singapore, which
reduces
its greenhouse gas released
because
of the rise of using
public
transits, is one of the cleanest cities in the world.
Additionally
,
because
of the reduction in gas release, the environment receives a better air condition.
Subsequently
, the whole society
changes
the transport-
used
habits will be overwhelming if there is a lack of a heaviness
compulsory
measure towards
personal
transports.
Nevertheless
, the ban on
personal
means of movement
apparently
violates the privacy and freedom
as well
as causes inconvenience to
people’s
movement.
Obviously
, the
compulsory
transportation will violate the privacy and freedom of a human which are basic
needs
of each human according to Maslow’s
needs
hierarchy,
clearly
regulates in the civil law of each nation.
Furthermore
, this infringement
also
results in the inconvenient travel. Despite the
government
can plan
very
detailed transporting schedule for the
public
transport
system, they
still
do not customize the schedule to each individual’s
needs
.
Thus
, the conflict between the real
needs
of users and the travel schedule of the
public
means is
apparently
unavoidable.
In conclusion
, the
compulsory
towards
personal
transports
, which may appear as a
good
measure to encourage the whole nation
use
the
public
transports
, may infringe to the privacy and freedom of the
people
.
Hence
,
instead
of forcing
people
, the
government
should spend a relative budget to educate
people
about the detrimental effects of
personal
transports
and
improve
the
public
transport
system beforehand.