In modern days the certain amount of our daily cuisine is carried from the places of origin. According to some people prefer only locally-made product items for their inconsideration of their significant benefits to the environment and finance. I personally support with the statement based on my reasons in the ensuing paragraphs.
Firstly, it is economically beneficial for both local farmers and consumers. If people choose the meal produced in origin where they live can become the crucial factor of increasing labour force and work place in there. Result in, this kind of benefits is likely to affect the improvement for farmers' life standard because the income is constantly rising from their small scale businesses. Another economically regarded reason is that it can be more cost-effective for consumers who are able to buy the foods without high rate of transportation fare or importing tax. For example, from my country’s experience many big scale food manufacturers run their business in near the capital city. For this reason many provincial shops need to pay carriage costs for staple food for capital city and all this money added up when consumers buy it.
Secondly, it is inevitable that big amount of gasoline is utilized for food transportation. According to the recent geographic survey, the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions caused by food freight have been dramatically increasing in recent years and accounts of 20 percent of total GHG emissions in Mongolia. However, we can tackle the worst impacts on the environment such as air pollution, encouraging the local food production.
On the other hand, people cannot be balanced their diet only relying on local food it means that the choice available to people in terms of varieties would be limited as some products are not contained specific nutritious is the main disadvantage. This limits the local markets trigger to sell value added products from a long distance away.
To conclude, although transforming a food from far away is made an opportunity for consumers, which they can ensure their variety of food demand, local food choice is not only much cheaper for consumers, but it also possible for them to increase their individual contribution to the environment and natural resource appropriate usage.
In modern days the certain amount of our daily cuisine
is carried
from the places of origin. According to
some
people
prefer
only
locally
-made product items for their inconsideration of their significant benefits to the environment and finance. I
personally
support with the statement based on my reasons in the ensuing paragraphs.
Firstly
, it is
economically
beneficial for both
local
farmers and
consumers
. If
people
choose the meal produced in origin where they
live
can become the crucial factor of increasing
labour
force and work place in there. Result in, this kind of benefits is likely to affect the improvement for farmers' life standard
because
the income is
constantly
rising from their
small
scale businesses. Another
economically
regarded reason is that it can be more cost-effective for
consumers
who are able to
buy
the
foods
without high rate of transportation fare or importing tax.
For example
, from my country’s experience
many
big
scale
food
manufacturers run their business in near the capital city.
For this reason
many
provincial shops need to pay carriage costs for staple
food
for capital city and all this money
added
up when
consumers
buy
it.
Secondly
, it is inevitable that
big
amount of gasoline
is utilized
for
food
transportation. According to the recent geographic survey, the greenhouse gas (
GHG
) emissions caused by
food
freight have been
dramatically
increasing in recent years and accounts of 20 percent of total
GHG
emissions in Mongolia.
However
, we can tackle the worst impacts on the environment such as air pollution, encouraging the
local
food
production.
On the other hand
,
people
cannot
be balanced
their diet
only
relying on
local
food
it means that the choice available to
people
in terms of varieties would
be limited
as
some
products are not contained specific nutritious is the main disadvantage. This limits the
local
markets trigger to sell value
added
products from a long distance away.
To conclude
, although transforming a
food
from far away
is made
an opportunity for
consumers
, which they can ensure their variety of
food
demand,
local
food
choice is not
only
much cheaper for
consumers
,
but
it
also
possible for them to increase their individual contribution to the environment and natural resource appropriate usage.