There has been a controversial issue that public transportation should be free to reduce traffic congestion. While some people agree that this would be a good solution, others argue that this has some drawbacks. From my perspective, I firmly believe that free public transportation's benefits do outweigh its drawbacks.
On the one hand, by providing fare-free public transportation, the government can encourage citizens to limit their use of private transportation such as: cars and motorbikes which are the two main causes of traffic congestion. A large number of personal vehicles on the roads have been exerting a lot of pressure on the traffic. In order to solve this problem, the government should offer free public transportation to encourage citizens to use it more frequently. For instance, if 20 people take the same bus route to travel from their office to their home in rush hours, there will be fewer cars and motorbikes on the roads. As a result, traffic congestion will be significantly reduced as buses and metros are designed to transport a large number of passengers. In addition, reducing traffic congestion also leads to a decrease in the traffic accident rate.
On the other hand, despite the fact that providing free public transportation is an effective solution to traffic congestion, this also has some problems. The salary of bus drivers will become a financial burden as the transport cost is free. This will demand the government to increase tax on other services. Consequently, there is inequality between people who use zero-fare public transportation and people who do not. In addition, providing free public transportation not only means that encouraging citizens to use it more frequently but also leads to the infrastructure degradation.
In conclusion, reducing traffic congestion by providing free public transportation has both advantages and disadvantages. However, its goods points are more significant than its drawbacks.
There has been a controversial issue that
public
transportation
should be
free
to
reduce
traffic
congestion
. While
some
people
agree
that this would be a
good
solution, others argue that this has
some
drawbacks. From my perspective, I
firmly
believe that
free
public
transportation's benefits do outweigh its drawbacks.
On the one hand, by providing fare-free
public
transportation
, the
government
can encourage citizens to limit their
use
of private
transportation
such as: cars and motorbikes which are the two main causes of
traffic
congestion
.
A large number of
personal vehicles on the roads have been exerting
a lot of
pressure on the
traffic
. In order to solve this problem, the
government
should offer
free
public
transportation
to encourage citizens to
use
it more
frequently
.
For instance
, if 20
people
take the same bus route to travel from their office to their home in rush hours, there will be fewer cars and motorbikes on the roads.
As a result
,
traffic
congestion
will be
significantly
reduced
as buses and metros
are designed
to transport
a large number of
passengers.
In addition
, reducing
traffic
congestion
also
leads to a decrease in the
traffic
accident rate.
On the other hand
, despite the fact that providing
free
public
transportation
is an effective solution to
traffic
congestion
, this
also
has
some
problems. The salary of bus drivers will become a financial burden as the transport cost is
free
. This will demand the
government
to increase tax on other services.
Consequently
, there is inequality between
people
who
use
zero-fare
public
transportation
and
people
who do not.
In addition
, providing
free
public
transportation
not
only
means that encouraging citizens to
use
it more
frequently
but
also
leads to the infrastructure degradation.
In conclusion
, reducing
traffic
congestion
by providing
free
public
transportation
has both advantages and disadvantages.
However
, its
goods
points are more significant than its drawbacks.