Increasing crime rate has become a grave problem in the past few years. While some individuals consider that death penalty is the best method to threaten the people from committing crimes, others opine that there are several other ways to curb the crime. This essay intends to delve into both sides of the argument in depth.
To begin with, the advocates of the statement argue that capital punishment is indeed a real justice for the victim. Since it would act as a deterrent for the other sections of the society who are involved in offending activities, therefore it will be eventually a great lesson for those individuals who disturb the peaceful atmosphere of the community and make it unfit for living. For instance, the problem of terrorism is gradually rising in almost all parts of the world, and in order to diminish the terrorist attack, governing bodies are implementing these stringent laws. What is more, serial killers can also be threatened to a substantial extent by applying these rules. In short, implementation of death punishment is an excellent way of curbing the criminals.
In contrast, the opponents feel that various alternative rules and regulations can also diminish the crime level. First of all, petty crimes such as theft, robbery, kidnapping and many more can be tackled by the short term prison. This will not only reduce minor offences, but also makes the society a better place to live in. To cite an example, if a person robs someone just because of poverty, then he should not be given death penalty instead he should be taught vocational skills in the prison. To recapitulate, other effective initiatives are also beneficial in eliminating the criminals.
To conclude, whether or not to give death penalty has become a controversial issue. In the above paragraphs, both approaches have been discussed in detail.
Increasing
crime
rate has become a grave problem in the past few years. While
some
individuals consider that death penalty is the best method to threaten the
people
from committing
crimes
, others opine that there are several
other
ways to curb the
crime
. This essay intends to delve into both sides of the argument in depth.
To
begin
with, the advocates of the statement argue that capital punishment is
indeed
a real justice for the victim. Since it would act as a deterrent for the
other
sections of the society who
are involved
in offending activities,
therefore
it will be
eventually
a great lesson for those individuals who disturb the peaceful atmosphere of the community and
make
it unfit for living.
For instance
, the problem of terrorism is
gradually
rising in almost all parts of the world, and in order to diminish the terrorist attack, governing bodies are implementing these stringent laws.
What is more
, serial killers can
also
be threatened
to a substantial extent by applying these
rules
. In short, implementation of death punishment is an excellent way of curbing the criminals.
In contrast
, the opponents feel that various alternative
rules
and regulations can
also
diminish the
crime
level.
First of all
, petty
crimes
such as theft, robbery, kidnapping and
many
more can
be tackled
by the short term prison. This will not
only
reduce
minor
offences
,
but
also
makes
the society a better place to
live
in. To cite an example, if a person robs someone
just
because
of poverty, then he should not be
given
death penalty
instead
he should
be taught
vocational
skills
in the prison. To recapitulate,
other
effective initiatives are
also
beneficial in eliminating the criminals.
To
conclude,
whether or not
to give death penalty has become a controversial issue. In the above paragraphs, both approaches have
been discussed
in detail.