Increasing crime rate has become a grave problem in the past few years. While some individuals consider that death penalty is the best method to threaten the people from committing crimes, others opine that there are several other ways to curb the crime. This essay intends to delve into both sides of the argument in depth.
To begin with, the advocates of the statement argue that capital punishment is indeed a real justice for the victim. Since it would act as a deterrent for the other sections of the society who are involved in offending activities, therefore it will be eventually a great lesson for those individuals who disturb the peaceful atmosphere of the community and make it unfit for living. For instance, the problem of terrorism is gradually rising in almost all parts of the world, and in order to diminish the terrorist attack, governing bodies are implementing these stringent laws. What is more, serial killers can also be threatened to a substantial extent by applying these rules. In short, implementation of death punishment is an excellent way of curbing the criminals.
In contrast, the opponents feel that various alternative rules and regulations can also diminish the crime level. First of all, petty crimes such as theft, robbery, kidnapping and many more can be tackled by the short term prison. This will not only reduce minor offences, but also makes the society a better place to live in. To cite an example, if a person robs someone just because of poverty, then he should not be given death penalty instead he should be taught vocational skills in the prison. To recapitulate, other effective initiatives are also beneficial in eliminating the criminals.
To conclude, whether or not to give death penalty has become a controversial issue. In the above paragraphs, both approaches have been discussed in detail. 
Increasing  
crime
 rate has become a grave problem in the past few years. While  
some
 individuals consider that death penalty is the best method to threaten the  
people
 from committing  
crimes
, others opine that there are several  
other
 ways to curb the  
crime
. This essay intends to delve into both sides of the argument in depth.
To  
begin
 with, the advocates of the statement argue that capital punishment is  
indeed
 a real justice for the victim. Since it would act as a deterrent for the  
other
 sections of the society who  
are involved
 in offending activities,  
therefore
 it will be  
eventually
 a great lesson for those individuals who disturb the peaceful atmosphere of the community and  
make
 it unfit for living.  
For instance
, the problem of terrorism is  
gradually
 rising in almost all parts of the world, and in order to diminish the terrorist attack, governing bodies are implementing these stringent laws.  
What is more
, serial killers can  
also
  be threatened
 to a substantial extent by applying these  
rules
. In short, implementation of death punishment is an excellent way of curbing the criminals. 
In contrast
, the opponents feel that various alternative  
rules
 and regulations can  
also
 diminish the  
crime
 level.  
First of all
, petty  
crimes
 such as theft, robbery, kidnapping and  
many
 more can  
be tackled
 by the short term prison. This will not  
only
  reduce
 minor  
offences
,  
but
  also
  makes
 the society a better place to  
live
 in. To cite an example, if a person robs someone  
just
  because
 of poverty, then he should not be  
given
 death penalty  
instead
 he should  
be taught
 vocational  
skills
 in the prison. To recapitulate,  
other
 effective initiatives are  
also
 beneficial in eliminating the criminals. 
To
 conclude,  
whether or not
 to give death penalty has become a controversial issue. In the above paragraphs, both approaches have  
been discussed
 in detail.