Some people believe that building new railway line, bullet train and metro are mandatory whereas others opine that it is better to upgrade existing mass transport. However, In my opinion, I personally believe that maintaining the available means of transport is a better choice as it is less costly and more feasible. This essay intends to analyse both perspectives.
On one hand, by creating new railway lines and metros will provide a more suitable and convenient solution to travel. In other words, new paths will emerge, modern trains will be faster and smoother,
Eventually reducing gaps between the cities. For example, In the USA, it was found that due introduction of bullet trains, transit of people has risen significantly and more people are able to travel from place to place. Moreover, government metros are much cheaper than the regular means of shipment and Hence, people are able to save their money.
On the other hand, improving existing means will also definitely help with the overall transition of people and it will be much cheaper than implementing trains. I mean, upgrading public transport will be instantly beneficial for the masses and thus it will be more effective. For instance, renovation of mass transport takes just 6 months while construction of new ways of transportation will take more time. further, the saved money can be used to provide subsidies for the people who travel frequently.
To encapsulate, both ways have the same objective to improve productivity of the transport system. Introducing modern ways will provide fast and handy solutions while compromising the budgets, but, restoration of public transit will be cheaper and it will take less time to upgrade.
Some
people
believe that building
new
railway line, bullet
train
and metro are mandatory whereas others opine that it is better to upgrade existing mass
transport
.
However
, In my opinion, I
personally
believe that maintaining the available
means
of
transport
is a better choice as it is less costly and more feasible. This essay intends to
analyse
both perspectives.
On one hand, by creating
new
railway lines and metros will provide a more suitable and convenient solution to travel.
In other words
,
new
paths will emerge, modern
trains
will be faster and smoother,
Eventually
reducing gaps between the cities.
For example
, In the USA, it
was found
that due introduction of bullet
trains
, transit of
people
has risen
significantly
and more
people
are able to travel from place to place.
Moreover
,
government
metros are much cheaper than the regular
means
of shipment and
Hence
,
people
are able to save their money.
On the other hand
, improving existing
means
will
also
definitely
help
with the
overall
transition of
people
and it will be much cheaper than implementing
trains
. I
mean
, upgrading public
transport
will be
instantly
beneficial for the masses and
thus
it will be more effective.
For instance
, renovation of mass
transport
takes
just
6 months while construction of
new
ways of transportation will take more time.
further
, the saved money can be
used
to provide subsidies for the
people
who travel
frequently
.
To encapsulate, both ways have the same objective to
improve
productivity of the
transport
system. Introducing modern ways will provide
fast
and handy solutions while compromising the budgets,
but
, restoration of public transit will be cheaper and it will take less time to upgrade.