It is important to consider whether the government should invest the tax payer's money on renovating the traditional buildings or constructing modern infrastructure. I strongly support the former view, in my perspective restoration of existing buildings is vital because these monuments not only represent the culture and heritage of the nation but also promote tourism.
To begin with, it is quintessential for the government to spend money on the renovation of the old museums, temples and building, owing to the heritage value of these buildings. In other words, most of the ancient monuments were built by our ancestors which represent the uniqueness of ethnic values of the community and connect the society to the rich tradition. The UNESCO World Heritage site, the Ajanta and Ellora caves in India, serve the best example of the monuments which act as the epitome of cultural and religious heritage. Therefore, if these buildings are not maintained, then our future generation will possibly lose touch with history. Moreover, we must preserve historical constructions for our future generations and understand that even if one piece is destroyed, it is destroyed forever.
Additionally, my viewpoint is further bolstered by the reason that the maintenance of ancient buildings leads to the promotion of tourism. The reason for this is these monuments always attract the tourists from different countries and maintaining them will add icing on the cake, as a result, a surge in tourists will lead to the economic development of the host country. For instance, 40% of the gross economy of India is dependent on tourism, in that situation renovation and preservation of ancient tourist places is extremely important.
In conclusion, although renovation and restoration involve a substantial amount of money, in my view, it is more beneficial in comparison to the construction of new ones in terms of preserving the nation's ethnicity and promoting national tourism.
It is
important
to consider whether the
government
should invest the tax payer's money on renovating the traditional
buildings
or constructing modern infrastructure. I
strongly
support the former view, in my perspective restoration of existing
buildings
is vital
because
these
monuments
not
only
represent the culture and
heritage
of the nation
but
also
promote tourism.
To
begin
with, it is quintessential for the
government
to spend money on the renovation of the
old
museums, temples and
building
, owing to the
heritage
value of these
buildings
.
In other words
, most of the ancient
monuments
were built
by our ancestors which represent the uniqueness of ethnic values of the community and connect the society to the rich tradition. The UNESCO World
Heritage
site, the
Ajanta
and
Ellora
caves in India, serve the best example of the
monuments
which act as the epitome of cultural and religious
heritage
.
Therefore
, if these
buildings
are not maintained, then our future generation will
possibly
lose touch with history.
Moreover
, we
must
preserve historical constructions for our future generations and understand that even if one piece is
destroyed
, it is
destroyed
forever.
Additionally
, my viewpoint is
further
bolstered by the reason that the maintenance of ancient
buildings
leads to the promotion of tourism.
The reason for this is
these
monuments
always attract the tourists from
different
countries and maintaining them will
add
icing on the cake,
as a result
, a surge in tourists will lead to the economic development of the host country.
For instance
, 40% of the gross economy of India is dependent on tourism, in that situation renovation and preservation of ancient tourist places is
extremely
important
.
In conclusion
, although renovation and restoration involve a substantial amount of money, in my view, it is more beneficial
in comparison
to the construction of new ones in terms of preserving the nation's ethnicity and promoting national tourism.