Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The threat of nuclear weapons maintains world peace. Nuclear power provides cheap and clean energy. The benefits of nuclear technology far outweigh the disadvantages. To what extent do you agree or disagree? v.3

The threat of nuclear weapons maintains world peace. Nuclear power provides cheap and clean energy. The benefits of nuclear technology far outweigh the disadvantages. v. 3
Advocates claim that nuclear energy derived from uranium can be weaponized to keep this chaotic world in harmony, whilst some also support to use it as an energy source due to the low price and pollutant-free characteristics. I totally agree that the advantages of advancement with nuclear power far outweigh its negative costs, the reason is that the technology is as well very cost-effective and economical despite the harmful effects it may impose in times of accidents. The production of nuclear power is known to be very cost-effective. A little piece of uranium can synthesise hundreds of thousands of energy at a time, comparing to the others. In other words, merchants will only have to purchase much less fuel at a more affordable price to generate the same amount of energy. This implies that the generation of nuclear energy is very economical and thus nuclear technology will be much more accessible to various groups in society. As well as this, the fact that only a little uranium is used each time also suggests how abundant the energy source will be for generations, and that we will no longer have to look for alternatives shortly. Hence it shows that nuclear technology is rather sustainable for different usage. Nonetheless, those who cast doubts on nuclear technology criticise the severe damage nuclear technology could lead to. In cases of emergencies, radioactive substances leaked out from the nuclear plant accidentally can be significantly detrimental to living organisms including human. By ways of illustration, the harmful substances given out during the well-known Fukushima nuclear disaster in 2011 caused the evacuation of citizens, and even after eight years, this once beautiful and dazzling city is yet to be rebuilt and redeveloped. In conclusion, there is a wide spectrum of opinions on nuclear technology, supporters proclaim that nuclear technology can be widely used in times of war, as an environmental-friendly energy source, and as a cost-effective option for all. Whilst sceptics argue that nuclear technology is too risky to utilise and may impose terrible consequences in unpredictable incidents. On balance, however, I believe the advantages of it has outweighed the negative impacts. Given this situation, it would be best to follow all the rules and instructions carefully and conscientiously when utilising this powerful energy resource.
Advocates claim that nuclear
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
derived from uranium can
be weaponized
to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
keep
this chaotic world in harmony, whilst
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
also
support to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
it as an
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
source due to the low price and pollutant-free characteristics. I
totally
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
agree
that the advantages of advancement with nuclear power far outweigh its
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
negative
costs, the reason is that the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
technology
is
as well
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
very
cost-effective and economical despite the harmful effects it may impose in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
times
of accidents.

The production of nuclear power
is known
to be
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
very
cost-effective. A
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
little
piece of uranium can
Possible spelling mistake. 'synthesise' is British English.
synthesise
hundreds of thousands of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
at a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
time
, comparing to the others.
In other words
, merchants will
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
have to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
purchase
much less fuel at a more affordable price to generate the same amount of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
.
This implies that
the generation of nuclear
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
is
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
very
economical and
thus
nuclear
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
technology
will be much more accessible to various groups in society.
As well
as this, the fact that
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
a
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
little
uranium is
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
used
each
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
time
also
suggests how abundant the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
source will be for generations, and that we will no longer
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
have to
look for alternatives shortly.
Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Hence
it
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
shows
that nuclear
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
technology
is
rather
sustainable for
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
different
usage.

Nonetheless, those who cast doubts on nuclear
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
technology
Possible spelling mistake. 'criticise' is British English.
criticise
the severe damage nuclear
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
technology
could lead to. In cases of emergencies, radioactive substances leaked out from the nuclear plant
accidentally
can be
significantly
detrimental to living organisms including human. By ways of illustration, the harmful substances
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
given
out during the well-known Fukushima nuclear disaster in 2011 caused the evacuation of citizens, and even after eight years, this once
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
beautiful
and dazzling city is
yet
to be rebuilt and redeveloped.

In conclusion
, there is a wide spectrum of opinions on nuclear
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
technology
, supporters proclaim that nuclear
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
technology
can be
widely
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
used
in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
times
of war, as an environmental-friendly
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
source, and as a cost-effective option for all. Whilst
Possible spelling mistake. 'sceptics' is British English.
sceptics
argue that nuclear
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
technology
is too risky to
Possible spelling mistake. 'utilise' is British English.
utilise
and may impose terrible consequences in unpredictable incidents. On balance,
however
, I believe the advantages of it has outweighed the
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
negative
impacts.
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
Given
this situation, it would be best to follow all the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
rules
and instructions
carefully
and
conscientiously
when
Possible spelling mistake. 'utilising' is British English.
utilising
this powerful
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
resource.
15Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
20Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
6Mistakes

IELTS essay The threat of nuclear weapons maintains world peace. Nuclear power provides cheap and clean energy. The benefits of nuclear technology far outweigh the disadvantages. v. 3

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
378 words
6
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Similar posts


Recent posts