It is an obvious fact that the rates of serious crimes committed annually show an upward trend. According to some people, the capital punishment seems to be the most influential method to deter the problem, while many others are in opinion that alternative actions are required. This essay will try out to discuss both sides of the argument in detail.
On the one hand, the death penalty is thought to be the best way to decrease the number of crimes committed each year. Supporters of this argument, consider that sentencing to death the criminals, who perpetrated serious offense, such as rape and murder, or members of the dangerous terrorist groups, will prevent other people, especially teenagers, from committing terrific actions. Furthermore, they believe that in order to maintain the justice in society, the victims and also their family members need to be sure that their violated rights have been defended properly. For example, the parents of the children who murdered during the bomb attack can find a little solace only after killing of people who were responsible for this crime.
On the other hand, opposite viewers of the capital punishment think that other possible measures are needed to tackle the problem. From their perspective, the most important way is to educate offenders and give them opportunities to learn some professional skills and find appropriate jobs. According to them, uneducated and jobless individuals, particularly young adults, tend to commit serious crimes more often than other members of the community. For instance, if a prisoner has been taught carpentry in the jail, he will have a chance to get a suitable work after the end of the sentence. As a result, having a job and earning money will make him feel secure and avoid involving in any violent activities.
To conclude, although some people claim that the death penalty is the best way to reduce the number of serious crimes, many other individuals argue that some other measures are needed to deter the problem. 
It is an obvious fact that the rates of  
serious
  crimes
 committed  
annually
  show
 an upward trend. According to  
some
  people
, the capital punishment seems to be the most influential method to deter the problem, while  
many
 others are in opinion that alternative actions  
are required
. This essay will try out to discuss both sides of the argument in detail.
On the one hand, the death penalty is  
thought
 to be the best way to decrease the number of  
crimes
 committed each year. Supporters of this argument, consider that sentencing to death the criminals, who perpetrated  
serious
 offense, such as rape and murder, or members of the  
dangerous
 terrorist groups, will  
prevent
  other
  people
,  
especially
  teenagers
, from committing terrific actions.  
Furthermore
, they believe that in order to maintain the justice in society, the victims and  
also
 their family members need to be sure that their violated rights have  
been defended
  properly
.  
For example
, the parents of the children who murdered during the bomb attack can find a  
little
 solace  
only
 after killing of  
people
 who were responsible for this crime.
On the  
other
 hand, opposite viewers of the capital punishment  
think
 that  
other
 possible measures  
are needed
 to tackle the problem. From their perspective, the most  
important
 way is to educate offenders and give them opportunities to learn  
some
 professional  
skills
 and find appropriate jobs. According to them, uneducated and jobless individuals,  
particularly
 young adults, tend to commit  
serious
  crimes
 more  
often
 than  
other
 members of the community.  
For instance
, if a prisoner has  
been taught
 carpentry in the jail, he will have a chance to  
get
 a suitable work after the  
end
 of the sentence.  
As a result
, having a job and earning money will  
make
 him feel secure and avoid involving in any violent activities. 
To conclude
, although  
some
  people
 claim that the death penalty is the best way to  
reduce
 the number of  
serious
  crimes
,  
many
  other
 individuals argue that  
some
  other
 measures  
are needed
 to deter the problem.