Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The money given to help poor countries does not solve the problem of poverty, so rich countries should give other types of help instead. To what extent do you agree or disagree? v.4

The money given to help poor countries does not solve the problem of poverty, so rich countries should give other types of help instead. v. 4
For many recent years, a huge amount of financial aid has been given to impoverished nations to help them deal with poverty. Although this solution may help in some aspects, I personally think that the problem could not be handled completely by giving money and governments should implement other alternatives should be deployed. It can be clearly seen that the solution of pouring money into destitute countries has many drawbacks. The first point to note is that the money may never reach people in need. In many developing countries, the lack of transparency and ability to lead the nations of the management systems are causing prevalent corruption in government structure. As a result, politicians and government officials become those who are benefited instead of their citizens. In addition, the recipient countries mostly are not capable of making the best use of monetary support since they may not have enough skilled manpower, technology or infrastructure to develop with the money given. An illustration would be my country, Vietnam, which is still a developing country yet we have owed billions of dollars to foreign nations. Furthermore, in some cases, the poor countries will become dependent on donor countries as they have been used to getting help from other rich countries. As a consequence, the receiving countries become increasingly more dependent on their givers and more heavily indebted. On the other hand, there are still some certain positive sides of this scheme. It is undeniable that the donations provided by developed countries have definitely helped accelerate the economy of the poor nations in some extents. Moreover, foreign aids have saved many lives in those countries which usually suffer from disasters and diseases every year. In conclusion, donating money to destitute nations may improve the situation in some ways, however, it is not a comprehensive solution and other kinds of help such as changing the constitution, promote education and healthcare systems as well as combat corruption in order to handle the problems properly.
For
many
recent years, a huge amount of financial aid has been
given
to impoverished
nations
to
help
them deal with poverty. Although this solution may
help
in
some
aspects, I
personally
think
that the problem could not
be handled
completely by giving
money
and
governments
should implement
other
alternatives should
be deployed
.

It can be
clearly
seen
that the solution of pouring
money
into destitute
countries
has
many
drawbacks. The
first
point to note is that the
money
may never reach
people
in need. In
many
developing
countries
, the lack of transparency and ability to lead the
nations
of the management systems are causing prevalent corruption in
government
structure.
As a result
, politicians and
government
officials become those who
are benefited
instead
of their citizens.
In addition
, the recipient
countries
mostly
are not capable of making the best
use
of monetary support since they may not have
enough
skilled manpower, technology or infrastructure to develop with the
money
given
. An illustration would be my
country
, Vietnam, which is
still
a developing
country
yet
we have owed billions of dollars to foreign
nations
.
Furthermore
, in
some
cases, the poor
countries
will become dependent on donor
countries
as they have been
used
to getting
help
from
other
rich
countries
. As a consequence, the receiving
countries
become
increasingly
more dependent on their givers and more
heavily
indebted.

On the
other
hand, there are
still
some
certain
positive
sides of this scheme. It is undeniable that the donations provided by developed
countries
have definitely
helped
accelerate the economy of the poor
nations
in
some
extents.
Moreover
, foreign aids have saved
many
lives
in those
countries
which
usually
suffer from disasters and diseases every year.

In conclusion
, donating
money
to destitute
nations
may
improve
the situation in
some
ways,
however
, it is not a comprehensive solution and
other
kinds of
help
such as changing the constitution, promote education and healthcare systems
as well
as combat corruption in order to handle the problems
properly
.
15Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
29Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
1Mistakes
Change your language and you change your thoughts.
Karl Albrecht

IELTS essay The money given to help poor countries does not solve the problem of poverty, so rich countries should give other types of help instead. v. 4

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
329 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Similar posts