There is a controversial issue about who should deal with the problem of climate change. Some ecologists think that global society should take a responsibility for this, while some politicians disagree with them and suggest that every country should solve it alone. In this essay, I will consider both points of view and agrees with the idea of international involvement.
Let us start with the reasons why some ecologists argue that global organizations should tackle global warming. The first reason is that joint efforts bring more results. It is hardly possible for developing countries on their own to deal with climate change, because unlike developed states, they can neither afford expensive technologies nor hire well-known ecologists, but with the financial help from global organizations, they can purchase equipment as well as employ experts. Another motive is a low chance of funding misuse. Many countries are receiving the help from developed countries to solve this problem, but they have not achieved any noticeable goals, mostly because some corrupted politicians use most of the money for their own advantage.
However, some politicians state that international societies should not address the problem with climate change. They justify their opinion with the following arguments. Firstly, they may be unaware of regional specifics. Many international societies find it arduous to deal with climate alteration in some regions, since they have either their own geographic features or ways of economic development. For example, Kazakstan heavily depends on production of both oil and gas, which cannot be easily replaced by other industries. Secondly, the bureaucracy in international organizations often poses obstacles rather than a solution. Many joint ventures, which are founded to reduce global warming, often work ineffectively owing to their complexity in organization, so it often happens that local organizations work faster and more productively as long as they obtain monetary assistance abroad.
In conclusion, even though some politicians say that each country has to solve the problem with climate alteration itself, I think that international organizations can solve this problem more effectively for the above mentioned arguments. 
There is a controversial issue about who should deal with the  
problem
 of  
climate
  change
.  
Some
 ecologists  
think
 that  
global
 society should take a responsibility for this, while  
some
  politicians
 disagree with them and suggest that every  
country
 should  
solve
 it alone. In this essay, I will consider both points of view and  
agrees
 with the  
idea
 of  
international
 involvement. 
Let
 us  
start
 with the reasons why  
some
 ecologists argue that  
global
  organizations
 should tackle  
global
 warming. The  
first
 reason is that joint efforts bring more results. It is hardly possible for developing  
countries
 on their  
own
 to deal with  
climate
  change
,  
because
 unlike developed states, they can neither afford expensive technologies nor hire well-known ecologists,  
but
 with the financial  
help
 from  
global
  organizations
, they can  
purchase
 equipment  
as well
 as employ experts. Another motive is a low chance of funding misuse.  
Many
  countries
 are receiving the  
help
 from developed  
countries
 to  
solve
 this  
problem
,  
but
 they have not achieved any noticeable goals,  
mostly
  because
  some
 corrupted  
politicians
  use
 most of the money for their  
own
 advantage. 
However
,  
some
  politicians
 state that  
international
 societies should not address the  
problem
 with  
climate
  change
. They justify their opinion with the following arguments.  
Firstly
, they may be unaware of regional specifics.  
Many
  international
 societies find it arduous to deal with  
climate
 alteration in  
some
 regions, since they have either their  
own
 geographic features or ways of economic development.  
For example
,  
Kazakstan
  heavily
 depends on production of both oil and gas, which cannot be  
easily
 replaced by other industries.  
Secondly
, the bureaucracy in  
international
  organizations
  often
 poses obstacles  
rather
 than a solution.  
Many
 joint ventures, which  
are founded
 to  
reduce
  global
 warming,  
often
 work  
ineffectively
 owing to their complexity in  
organization
,  
so
 it  
often
 happens that local  
organizations
 work faster and more  
productively
 as long as they obtain monetary assistance abroad. 
In conclusion
,  
even though
  some
  politicians
 say that each  
country
  has to
  solve
 the  
problem
 with  
climate
 alteration itself, I  
think
 that  
international
  organizations
 can  
solve
 this  
problem
 more  
effectively
 for the above mentioned arguments.