There is a controversial issue about who should deal with the problem of climate change. Some ecologists think that global society should take a responsibility for this, while some politicians disagree with them and suggest that every country should solve it alone. In this essay, I will consider both points of view and agrees with the idea of international involvement.
Let us start with the reasons why some ecologists argue that global organizations should tackle global warming. The first reason is that joint efforts bring more results. It is hardly possible for developing countries on their own to deal with climate change, because unlike developed states, they can neither afford expensive technologies nor hire well-known ecologists, but with the financial help from global organizations, they can purchase equipment as well as employ experts. Another motive is a low chance of funding misuse. Many countries are receiving the help from developed countries to solve this problem, but they have not achieved any noticeable goals, mostly because some corrupted politicians use most of the money for their own advantage.
However, some politicians state that international societies should not address the problem with climate change. They justify their opinion with the following arguments. Firstly, they may be unaware of regional specifics. Many international societies find it arduous to deal with climate alteration in some regions, since they have either their own geographic features or ways of economic development. For example, Kazakstan heavily depends on production of both oil and gas, which cannot be easily replaced by other industries. Secondly, the bureaucracy in international organizations often poses obstacles rather than a solution. Many joint ventures, which are founded to reduce global warming, often work ineffectively owing to their complexity in organization, so it often happens that local organizations work faster and more productively as long as they obtain monetary assistance abroad.
In conclusion, even though some politicians say that each country has to solve the problem with climate alteration itself, I think that international organizations can solve this problem more effectively for the above mentioned arguments.
There is a controversial issue about who should deal with the
problem
of
climate
change
.
Some
ecologists
think
that
global
society should take a responsibility for this, while
some
politicians
disagree with them and suggest that every
country
should
solve
it alone. In this essay, I will consider both points of view and
agrees
with the
idea
of
international
involvement.
Let
us
start
with the reasons why
some
ecologists argue that
global
organizations
should tackle
global
warming. The
first
reason is that joint efforts bring more results. It is hardly possible for developing
countries
on their
own
to deal with
climate
change
,
because
unlike developed states, they can neither afford expensive technologies nor hire well-known ecologists,
but
with the financial
help
from
global
organizations
, they can
purchase
equipment
as well
as employ experts. Another motive is a low chance of funding misuse.
Many
countries
are receiving the
help
from developed
countries
to
solve
this
problem
,
but
they have not achieved any noticeable goals,
mostly
because
some
corrupted
politicians
use
most of the money for their
own
advantage.
However
,
some
politicians
state that
international
societies should not address the
problem
with
climate
change
. They justify their opinion with the following arguments.
Firstly
, they may be unaware of regional specifics.
Many
international
societies find it arduous to deal with
climate
alteration in
some
regions, since they have either their
own
geographic features or ways of economic development.
For example
,
Kazakstan
heavily
depends on production of both oil and gas, which cannot be
easily
replaced by other industries.
Secondly
, the bureaucracy in
international
organizations
often
poses obstacles
rather
than a solution.
Many
joint ventures, which
are founded
to
reduce
global
warming,
often
work
ineffectively
owing to their complexity in
organization
,
so
it
often
happens that local
organizations
work faster and more
productively
as long as they obtain monetary assistance abroad.
In conclusion
,
even though
some
politicians
say that each
country
has to
solve
the
problem
with
climate
alteration itself, I
think
that
international
organizations
can
solve
this
problem
more
effectively
for the above mentioned arguments.