It is undeniable that movies, programmes and many sorts of media are filled with violent scenes and the consequences are that many crimes are committed with violence. Therefore, I agree with this statement that government should do something to control such content.
Violence in the media brings on lots of adverse impact on the audience’s mindset. Brutality in such programmes and movies may gradually change viewers attitudes, manners and personalities. The youth and children are likely to be the victims of this because they are too immature to control their thoughts and actions. They are usually inspired by the heroism and individualism, therefore solving problems and conflicts with physical power rather than consultation and conversation. This often leads to crimes in school such as bullying. Not only children, but also adults are affected. Some might want to show off their power so they try to imitate what they see and there may be more serious crimes carried out such as murder. If violence in movies and programmes are not controlled and censored, there are still negative influences on the audiences and more crimes are added to the social problems.
In addition to what is expressed above, I believe that it will be harder for governments to control illegal acts if sorts of media keep showing violent contents. For example, war documentaries which present the strategies used in war and films with ideas about crimes might be the sources for criminals to consult and do a ‘perfect’ crimes. The anti-crimes forces will have more difficulties in stopping criminals because they are more and more smart.
In conclusion, I’m all in the favour of the idea that government should restrict the violent contents because it will decrease the numbers of offences committed and also reduce the negative effects among citizens, especially the youth and children.
It is undeniable that movies,
programmes
and
many
sorts of media
are filled
with violent scenes and the consequences are that
many
crimes
are committed
with violence.
Therefore
, I
agree
with this statement that
government
should do something to control such content.
Violence in the media brings on lots of adverse impact on the audience’s mindset. Brutality in such
programmes
and movies may
gradually
change
viewers attitudes, manners and personalities. The youth and children are likely to be the victims of this
because
they are too immature to control their thoughts and actions. They are
usually
inspired by the heroism and individualism,
therefore
solving problems and conflicts with physical power
rather
than consultation and conversation. This
often
leads to
crimes
in school such as bullying. Not
only
children,
but
also
adults are
affected
.
Some
might want to
show
off their power
so
they try to imitate what they
see
and there may be more serious
crimes
carried out such as murder. If violence in movies and
programmes
are not controlled and censored, there are
still
negative
influences on the audiences and more
crimes
are
added
to the social problems.
In addition
to what
is expressed
above, I believe that it will be harder for
governments
to control illegal acts if sorts of media
keep
showing violent contents.
For example
, war documentaries which present the strategies
used
in war and films with
ideas
about
crimes
might be the sources for criminals to consult and do a ‘perfect’
crimes
. The anti-crimes forces will have more difficulties in stopping criminals
because
they are more and more smart.
In conclusion
, I’m all in the
favour
of the
idea
that
government
should restrict the violent contents
because
it will decrease the numbers of
offences
committed and
also
reduce
the
negative
effects among citizens,
especially
the youth and children.