It is true that development of children relies largely oo the surroundings they are grown. Some people argue that children should grow in the villages, whereas some others claim that living in town is good for the growth of children. However, I disagree with the argument that rural areas are better for the development of children than cities.
To begin with, the opportunities available for children in town areas are inevitable. The educational institutions in cities provide wide opportunities for students to develop their skills and to enhance their abilities in academics as well as other extra curricular activities. The educational institutions in cities implement modern learning methods and advanced education for students, which introduce the to worlds of technology from their early classes. Moreover, people living in towns are considered as more advanced, so it is believed that children living in cities acquire wider view about the technological advancements and also it help to adapt the modern lifestyle. For instance, it is a fact that children living in towns have more explored to world by the training provided by the educational institutions and provide lot of opportunities to participate in international competitions.
On the other hand, it is a fact that rural areas of country are less developed. The limited available facilities and technological advancements, impact the growth of children. In addition, inefficient communication is another major drawback of countryside education, which affect students in academics and it limits to less job opportunities. For example, the schools in the villages lack in the sufficient availability computer, which drastically affects the children.
In conclusion, big cities are better for the development of children as it provides wide opportunities to enhance their skills as well as offer wide job offers. According to my opinion, tows are good for the development of children.
It is true that
development
of
children
relies
largely
oo
the surroundings they
are grown
.
Some
people
argue that
children
should grow in the villages, whereas
some
others claim that
living
in
town
is
good
for the growth of
children
.
However
, I disagree with the argument that rural areas are better for the
development
of
children
than cities.
To
begin
with, the
opportunities
available for
children
in
town
areas are inevitable. The educational institutions in
cities
provide wide
opportunities
for students to develop their
skills
and to enhance their abilities in academics
as well
as other
extra curricular
activities. The educational institutions in
cities
implement modern learning methods and advanced education for students, which introduce the to worlds of technology from their early classes.
Moreover
,
people
living
in
towns
are considered
as more advanced,
so
it
is believed
that
children
living
in
cities
acquire wider view about the technological advancements and
also
it
help
to adapt the modern lifestyle.
For instance
, it is a fact that
children
living
in
towns
have more explored to world by the training provided by the educational institutions and provide
lot of
opportunities
to participate in international competitions.
On the other hand
, it is a fact that rural areas of country are less developed. The limited available facilities and technological advancements, impact the growth of
children
.
In addition
, inefficient communication is another major drawback of countryside education, which affect students in academics and it limits to less job
opportunities
.
For example
, the schools in the villages lack in the sufficient availability computer, which
drastically
affects the children.
In conclusion
,
big
cities
are better for the
development
of
children
as it provides wide
opportunities
to enhance their
skills
as well
as offer wide job offers. According to my opinion, tows are
good
for the
development
of
children
.
7Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
7Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
7Mistakes