These days, nothing has been so much debated as the government's role in supporting health care. There are some nations that offer a free medical assistance, whereas others countries think that it is as individual's responsibility. This essay will discuss both the sides of this argument before coming to a reasoned conclusion.
Primarily, It is obviously true that countries cannot afford certain expenses, as the governments have even other responsibilities such as national security as well as provide education. Hence, Individuals who can afford a private medical service, should at their own expenses as they have to protect themselves from unforeseen circumstances such as illnesses or accidents. There are a huge variety of benefits to own a private health care insurance that could be helpful in extreme conditions. To illustrate, a person generally has to wait for a treatment, while insured people can easily get a prompt access to a surgery operation. Therefore, under this perspective, having an insurance has a positive impact on the mankind.
On the other hand, free medical facilities must be provided to human beings who suffer from financial issues. Although we are living in a modern era, there are still many families who cannot arrange for such operations and drugs due to a minor income. Thus, it is up to the authorities to help and support financially these folks so that such humans will be able to sustain the cures too. For instance, a lung cancer operation needs so much money, yet if supported economically, the majority of people who earn lesser, could manage it in an easy way. Moreover, making the medical aid free for the needy persons will also improve the reputation of the country itself.
To conclude, as an overall judgement, those who can pay for a health insurance, should take the responsibility to insure their own lives. However, the country's leaders all over the world must keep supporting the poorer citizens, so that they can have equal quality of treatments regarding the well-beings.
These days, nothing has been
so
much debated as the
government
's role in supporting health care. There are
some
nations that offer a free
medical
assistance, whereas others countries
think
that it is as individual's responsibility. This essay will discuss both the sides of this argument
before
coming to a reasoned conclusion.
Primarily
, It is
obviously
true that countries cannot afford certain expenses, as the
governments
have even other responsibilities such as national security
as well
as provide education.
Hence
, Individuals
who
can afford a private
medical
service, should at their
own
expenses as they
have to
protect themselves from unforeseen circumstances such as illnesses or accidents. There are a huge variety of benefits to
own
a private health care insurance that could be helpful in extreme conditions. To illustrate, a person
generally
has to
wait for a treatment, while insured
people
can
easily
get
a prompt access
to a surgery operation.
Therefore
, under this perspective, having an insurance has a
positive
impact on the mankind.
On the other hand
, free
medical
facilities
must
be provided
to human beings
who
suffer from financial issues. Although we are living in a modern era, there are
still
many
families
who
cannot arrange for such operations and drugs due to a minor income.
Thus
, it is up to the authorities to
help
and support
financially
these folks
so
that such humans will be able to sustain the cures too.
For instance
, a lung cancer operation needs
so
much money,
yet
if supported
economically
, the majority of
people
who
earn lesser, could manage it
in an easy way
.
Moreover
, making the
medical
aid free for the needy persons will
also
improve
the reputation of the country itself.
To conclude
, as an
overall
judgement, those
who
can pay for a health insurance, should take the responsibility to insure their
own
lives
.
However
, the country's leaders all over the world
must
keep
supporting the poorer citizens,
so
that they can have equal quality of treatments regarding the well-beings.