The controversy surrounding the costs of medical health care is something that has been around for a few decades, and so far, it has seemed impossible to find common ground on the matter with each country adopting the measures that best suit them. While some choose to make the people responsible for their own medical costs others believe that the it is the government that should assume the costs of such needs regardless of the economic status of the person involved.
Firstly, one must take into ponderation how much money will the state require to support a free health system for everyone, and also take certain theories into account that may cause the amount of cost to increase. For example, now that the patients don’t need to pay for their medical service it is more probable that they will begin to seek professional medical assistant more frequently. On the other hand, one must also consider the lack of humanity that lies on not treating a patient because one cannot afford the bill.
Secondly, a patient that is responsible for its own health costs is most certain to get an insurance. Therefore, the government is likely to profit from its payment in the first years while in the latter years of the person’s life is more likely to have debt caused by the weaker physical state the insured person is in.
In conclusion, a person can only be responsible for its own health care services if one possesses a job to pay for them and to own the costs of the insurance. But, this being the case it should also be the government responsibility to guarantee each person has a proper job that allows them to owe such expenses. However, if that is not that case and it is impossible to create circumstances for each individual to earn enough money to pay for their medical bills and make sure the insurance companies still obtain profit. In that case, the option of the state providing an understanding health care system is definitely something to be taken into account.
The controversy surrounding the
costs
of
medical
health
care is something that has been around for a few decades, and
so
far, it has seemed impossible to find common ground on the matter with each country adopting the measures that best suit them. While
some
choose to
make
the
people
responsible for their
own
medical
costs
others believe that
the it
is the
government
that should assume the
costs
of such needs regardless of the economic status of the
person
involved.
Firstly
, one
must
take into
ponderation
how much money will the state require to support a free
health
system for everyone, and
also
take certain theories into account that may cause the amount of
cost
to increase.
For example
,
now
that the patients don’t need to pay for their
medical
service it is more probable that they will
begin
to seek professional
medical
assistant more
frequently
.
On the other hand
, one
must
also
consider the lack of humanity that lies on not treating a patient
because
one cannot afford the bill.
Secondly
, a patient
that is
responsible for its
own
health
costs
is most certain to
get
an insurance.
Therefore
, the
government
is likely to profit from its payment in the
first
years while in the latter years of the
person’s
life is more likely to have debt caused by the weaker physical state the insured
person
is in.
In conclusion
, a
person
can
only
be responsible for its
own
health
care services if one possesses a job to pay for them and to
own
the
costs
of the insurance.
But
, this being the case it should
also
be the
government
responsibility to guarantee each
person
has a proper job that
allows
them to owe such expenses.
However
, if
that is
not that case and it is impossible to create circumstances for each individual to earn
enough
money to pay for their
medical
bills and
make
sure the insurance
companies
still
obtain profit.
In that case
, the option of the state providing an understanding
health
care system is definitely something to
be taken
into account.
17Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
21Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
2Mistakes