In this present world, the utilization of machinery is rising constantly at a rapid rate. The benefit of machines is being taken in the classrooms, in various forms. There exists an argument that classroom teachers should totally be substituted for the sake of technics. These two sides of an argument will thoroughly be analysed in following paragraphs.
Firstly, the advancement of robots has been reached at a point where an artificial-centred machine is capable of inheriting the features and properties just as human possess. To cite an example, the Honda robot Asimov has potential to move his body and can manipulate objects as similar as human body do. Consequently, the prospect of imparting education by the robotic enriched lecturer is considerable. This is the reason that there exists an argument to use artificial intelligent teachers as replacement of human.
Nevertheless, a computer-aided instructor would have a lack of control over students in classrooms. For example, human guides have the capability to monitor the activities of students such as their misbehaviour during the time they are being taught. Along with that, they are able to hear the problems of their disciples and can solve these issues by motivating them to learn more. Unfortunately, robotic trainer would not be able to perform all those tasks as efficiently as schoolmasters do. Thus, the notion of replacement of human pundits by technological - centred teachers, is completely worthless.
To summarize, running an education centre entirely by machines cannot be supported. Therefore, it is predicted that there would be plenty of adverse effects of using artificial intelligence mentors in classrooms to educate children, as a result, the replacement of human gurus should be prohibited completely. 
In this present world, the utilization of machinery is rising  
constantly
 at a rapid rate. The benefit of machines is  
being taken
 in the classrooms, in various forms. There exists an argument that classroom teachers should  
totally
  be substituted
 for the sake of  
technics
. These two sides of an argument will  
thoroughly
 be  
analysed
 in following paragraphs. 
Firstly
, the advancement of robots has  
been reached
 at a point where an  
artificial-centred
 machine is capable of inheriting the features and properties  
just
 as  
human
 possess. To cite an example, the Honda robot Asimov has potential to  
move
 his body and can manipulate objects as similar as  
human
 body do.  
Consequently
, the prospect of imparting education by the robotic enriched lecturer is considerable. This is the reason that there exists an argument to  
use
 artificial intelligent teachers as replacement of human. 
Nevertheless
, a computer-aided instructor would have a lack of control over students in classrooms.  
For example
,  
human
 guides have the capability to monitor the activities of students such as their  
misbehaviour
 during the time they are  
being taught
. Along with that, they are able to hear the problems of their disciples and can solve these issues by motivating them to learn more. Unfortunately, robotic trainer would not be able to perform all those tasks as  
efficiently
 as schoolmasters do.  
Thus
, the notion of replacement of  
human
 pundits by technological  
-
  centred
 teachers, is completely worthless. 
To summarize
, running an education  
centre
  entirely
 by machines cannot  
be supported
.  
Therefore
, it  
is predicted
 that there would be  
plenty
 of adverse effects of using artificial intelligence mentors in classrooms to educate children,  
as a result
, the replacement of  
human
 gurus should  
be prohibited
 completely. 
7.5Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
7.5Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
7.5Mistakes