The best way to solve the world’s environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel. To what extent do you agree or disagree? v.3

The over consumption of fossil fuel has become as a major topic of concern recently. Some people suggest that increasing the fuel rate can be the solution to cope with the environmental issues. Personally, I believe that other measures should also be given equal consideration. Firstly, increasing the fuel expense cannot minimise the global dependence on fuel. It should be first noted that even when the bill of fuel increases significantly, people still cannot cut down the tremendous demand for petrol at once. For example, in daily life people still need to use their cars despite the fluctuation in petrol price. Another clear reason is that petrol is also intended for other applications in manufacturing industries and agricultural purposes. If the price of fuel increases, the national economy could suffer many unfavourable consequences. When it comes to reducing the greenhouse gas emissions, some measures should be taken to mitigate the problems of over consuming gas. The most practical measure of the moment is to reduce the demand for resources in daily activities like travelling or production. This can be done by encouraging people to turn to mass-producing energy-efficient products like hybrid cars or implementing new energy saving technology in the manufacture. Besides, the most sustainable solution is to lower the reliance on fuel by taking advantage of alternative resources. Wind and tidal power in the Netherlands, nuclear power in Japan and solar power in the United States have all proven their efficiency in energy in energy production. These could be employed in other parts of the world to minimise the global dependence on fossil fuel. As all existing data above shows that the only cutting down the fuel cost will not reduce the global warming effects. Some strong alternative measures need to be implemented to tackle this situation.