In contemporary life, the question as to whether or not traditional libraries should be preserved has drawn much attention from the public. Although I understand that breakthrough technology is beneficial in the sense of accommodating us with an array of advanced functions, conventional libraries is definitely an indispensable part for public access.
On the one hand, the advances in computer science have certainly contributed to our ability to adapt the changeably modern life, and a huge amount of latest information in particular. Obviously, traditional libraries are likely to be inferior to advanced science. In other words, anyone can get access to online reading resources easily which is featured by a limitless supply of digital-based information via ebook or videos with visual and auditory aids. Therefore, it is unnecessary to commute to the libraries and remember the deadline to return books as the process of registering and searching for books or reference materials seems to be more time-consuming and complicated than mouse handling.
On the other hand, I believe that traditional libraries still play a critical role with various tremendous benefits. To start with, as an ideal place with an impressive collection of time-honoured reading documents, libraries might enable readers to get exposure to such reliable resources that are not available on the online flatform. Moreover, preserving conventional libraries is considered as a way to deter readers from eye-related problems like shortsightedness, especially children who are more inclined to glue their eyes to the computer screen.
In conclusion, there is no doubt that online libraries have gained popularity in our digital age thanks to their outstanding functions. However, I truly believe that those latest cutting-edge technologies cannot completely replace the needs of public libraries.
In contemporary life,
the question as to whether or not
traditional libraries should
be preserved
has drawn much attention from the public. Although I understand that breakthrough technology is beneficial in the sense of accommodating us with an array of advanced functions, conventional libraries is definitely an indispensable part for public access.
On the one hand, the advances in computer science have
certainly
contributed to our ability to adapt the
changeably
modern life, and a huge amount of
latest
information
in particular
.
Obviously
, traditional libraries are likely to be inferior to advanced science.
In other words
, anyone can
get
access to online reading resources
easily
which
is featured
by a limitless supply of digital-based information via
ebook
or videos with visual and auditory aids.
Therefore
, it is unnecessary to commute to the libraries and remember the deadline to return books as the process of registering and searching for books or reference materials seems to be more time-consuming and complicated than mouse handling.
On the other hand
, I believe that traditional libraries
still
play a critical role with various tremendous benefits. To
start
with, as an ideal place with an impressive collection of
time-honoured
reading documents, libraries might enable readers to
get
exposure to such reliable resources that are not available on the online
flatform
.
Moreover
, preserving conventional libraries
is considered
as a way to deter readers from eye-related problems like shortsightedness,
especially
children who are more inclined to glue their eyes to the computer screen.
In conclusion
, there is no doubt that online libraries have gained popularity in our digital age thanks to their outstanding functions.
However
, I
truly
believe that those latest cutting-edge technologies cannot completely replace the needs of public libraries.