In today’s world, socialism and being a member of the society is a crucial value in our life. Contributing positively to the society is a target for everyone. Some people see that directing children to participate, and being a member of the society is something that should be ensured by the parents’ duty, while the other camp believes that it is the school’s task. Both sides of this debate will be analysed before drawing a conclusion.
On the one hand, assigning parents to teach their children to be the good members of the society is supported by some people. For example, parents may teach their children and guide them to assist poor people by providing the food prepared by their parents. This example shows how parents may take the lead, to guide their children to be positive and valued in the society. Therefore, this idea is supported by many. The parents are more close to the children and they can teach their kids the important aspects of being a good member of the society. Most of the children mimic their parents’ activities and thus the parents have a greater role in setting good examples for their kids.
On the other hand, many believe that school plays golden rule in children's life. For instance, a school may prepare a campaign for their students to clean certain areas in their city. Such attitude gives children practical experience in contributing to the society. Thus, many argue that it would be better to leave this to the school. The teachers on behalf of the school have a big role to teach the students those responsibilities. Since students listen to their teacher's suggestion and command, they are more likely to obey the things their teachers would teach. Finally, the curriculum and textbooks can include such topics to increase the awareness among the students.
In conclusion, the debate will always remain between both camps for assigning this responsibility. In my opinion, schools should take this task on their shoulders as the children spend most of their daytime there.
In
today
’s world, socialism and being a
member
of the
society
is a crucial value in our life. Contributing
positively
to the
society
is a target for everyone.
Some
people
see
that directing
children
to participate, and being a
member
of the
society
is something that should
be ensured
by the
parents’
duty, while the other camp believes that it is the
school’s
task. Both sides of this debate will be
analysed
before
drawing a conclusion.
On the one hand, assigning
parents
to
teach
their
children
to be the
good
members
of the
society
is supported
by
some
people
.
For example
,
parents
may
teach
their
children
and guide them to assist poor
people
by providing the food prepared by their
parents
. This example
shows
how
parents
may take the lead, to guide their
children
to be
positive
and valued in the
society
.
Therefore
, this
idea
is supported
by
many
. The
parents
are more close to the
children and
they can
teach
their kids the
important
aspects of being a
good
member
of the
society
. Most of the
children
mimic their
parents’
activities and
thus
the
parents
have a greater role in setting
good
examples for their kids.
On the other hand
,
many
believe that
school
plays golden
rule
in children's life.
For instance
, a
school
may prepare a campaign for their students to clean certain areas in their city. Such attitude gives
children
practical experience in contributing to the
society
.
Thus
,
many
argue that it would be better to
leave
this to the
school
. The teachers on behalf of the
school
have a
big
role to
teach
the students those responsibilities. Since students listen to their teacher's suggestion and command, they are more likely to obey the things their teachers would
teach
.
Finally
, the curriculum and textbooks can include such topics to increase the awareness among the students.
In conclusion
, the debate will always remain between both camps for assigning this responsibility. In my opinion,
schools
should take this task on their shoulders as the
children
spend most of their daytime there.