Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how theyoppose specific points made in the reading passage. v.2
Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how theyoppose specific points made in the reading passage. v. 2
The reading article state that alturstic atc exists amoung human and animals. It is proved that with 2 example. However, the lecture disagree with these definition and give opposite example which is given in reading article.
Firstly, according to the reading metariel human can act in unselfish behavior with other people. And it illustrates that with donation organs for strange people and share their food with them, but the lecture believe that people can not think others and they usually act in selfish way. The professor gives example that people can donation their example but it is only related with strange society which is mean that people know always is appluased by other strange people. In this reason despite people could share thier foods with other and donated thier organs with others, these acts can not provide people are unselfish to the professor.
Secondly, the reading article gives that an animal example. This example shows that involved meerkats behaviour when they are hunting. When Meerkats are eating the one of them observers a predict to other, this means a meerkat does not eat while other had full of stomach. This meerkat if there is a dangerous station for other meerkats, it will give signal for others. However, according to the lecture it is not true example fot unselfish acting beacuse if there is a dangerous circumstance a meerkat is espace which is has responsible to give signal for other. Besides other meerkats never stay to after the they has full of stomach. And they never care of a meerkat which is not eat a meat for observation purpose.
In the conlusion, even the reading article defend that animal and human are unselfish avaliables. The lecture provide that it is not true with two examples.
The
reading
article state that
alturstic
atc
exists
amoung
human and animals. It
is proved
that with 2
example
.
However
, the
lecture
disagree with
these definition
and
give
opposite
example
which is
given
in
reading
article.
Firstly
, according to the
reading
metariel
human can act in
unselfish
behavior with
other
people
. And it illustrates that with donation organs for strange
people
and share their food with them,
but
the
lecture
believe that
people
can not
think
others and
they
usually
act in selfish way. The professor
gives
example
that
people
can donation their
example
but
it is
only
related with strange society which is mean that
people
know always is
appluased
by
other
strange
people
. In this reason despite
people
could share
thier
foods with
other
and donated
thier
organs with others, these acts can not provide
people
are
unselfish
to the professor.
Secondly
, the
reading
article
gives
that an animal
example
. This
example
shows
that involved
meerkats
behaviour
when they are hunting. When
Meerkats
are eating the one of them observers
a predict
to
other
, this means a
meerkat
does not eat while
other
had full of stomach. This
meerkat
if there is a
dangerous
station for
other
meerkats
, it will
give
signal for others.
However
, according to the
lecture
it is not true
example
fot
unselfish
acting
beacuse
if there is a
dangerous
circumstance a
meerkat
is
espace
which is has responsible to
give
signal for
other
.
Besides
other
meerkats
never stay to after
the they
has
full of stomach. And they never care of a
meerkat
which is not
eat
a meat
for observation purpose.
In the
conlusion
, even the
reading
article defend that animal and human are
unselfish
avaliables
. The
lecture
provide
that it is not true with two
examples
.
6Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
42Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
29Mistakes