The necessity of helping poorer countries by wealthier nations has been debated by the United Nations over the past few decades. Some people believe that wealthy nations should be required to support less productive governments by providing discipline and sustenance. However, I agree with those who say that politicians and officials of underdeveloped countries are responsible for taking care of their citizens. In the following paragraphs, I will explore the reasons for those who believe in helping developing nations, as well as justified my viewpoint on the matter.
Some argue that developed countries should be required to supply less developed countries through food and information provisions. The main reason for this argument is that many developing nations have difficult circumstances to deal with, this might be a natural or humanitarian disaster such as earthquakes or civil wars. Based on that, strong economies would be able to deliver nourishments to war-torn cities and countries such as Yemen and Syria in the Middle East. After that, people in these countries should have access to training. This should be provided by countries that are capable of doing that, because if we leave it for those developing countries. It might take a long time to offer sufficient services. Also, in harsh conditions, people would not expect their governments to provide them with a qualified science system unless the country is strong enough economically.
On the other hand, I firmly believe that the governments of developing countries have to take responsibility to fight for their people and country. There are some obvious reasons why I am saying that. One supportive claim is that wealthy nations should prioritize their citizens’ needs. Every state has the right to make the best provisions to their people. Not only this, but also keep their countries highly ranked in terms of economic improvements. They also need to bring further economic developments in some aspects such as study and health. Secondly, economic growth is something that can be achieved. There is a point in which any country can start from for a growing economy, and it could happen to any nation, regarding this Singapore is a shining example. Instead of waiting for food and learning supplements from developing countries, they can work harder on fighting against corruption and introduce further transparency to their economies.
In sum, I maintain that countries that have less money should be in charge of finding a way to develop the economy and make better provisions for their residents.
The necessity of helping poorer
countries
by wealthier
nations
has
been debated
by the United
Nations
over the past few decades.
Some
people
believe that wealthy
nations
should
be required
to support less productive
governments
by providing discipline and sustenance.
However
, I
agree
with those who say that politicians and officials of underdeveloped
countries
are responsible for taking care of their citizens. In the following paragraphs, I will explore the reasons for those who believe in helping
developing
nations
,
as well
as justified my viewpoint on the matter.
Some
argue that developed
countries
should
be required
to supply less developed
countries
through food and information provisions. The main reason for this argument is that
many
developing
nations
have difficult circumstances to deal with, this might be a natural or humanitarian disaster such as earthquakes or civil wars. Based on that, strong economies would be able to deliver
nourishments
to war-torn cities and
countries
such as Yemen and Syria in the Middle East. After that,
people
in these
countries
should have access to training. This should
be provided
by
countries
that are capable of doing that,
because
if we
leave
it for those
developing
countries
. It might take a long time to offer sufficient services.
Also
, in harsh conditions,
people
would not
expect
their
governments
to provide them with a qualified science system unless the
country
is strong
enough
economically
.
On the other hand
, I
firmly
believe that the
governments
of
developing
countries
have to
take responsibility to fight for their
people
and
country
. There are
some
obvious reasons why I am saying that. One supportive claim is that wealthy
nations
should prioritize their citizens’ needs. Every state has the right to
make
the best provisions to their
people
. Not
only
this,
but
also
keep
their
countries
highly
ranked in terms of economic improvements. They
also
need to bring
further
economic developments in
some
aspects such as study and health.
Secondly
, economic growth is something that can
be achieved
. There is a point in which any
country
can
start
from for a growing economy, and it could happen to any
nation
, regarding this Singapore is a shining example.
Instead
of waiting for food and learning supplements from
developing
countries
, they can work harder on fighting against corruption and introduce
further
transparency to their economies.
In sum, I maintain that
countries
that have less money should be in charge of finding a way to develop the economy and
make
better provisions for their residents.