It is one of the fundamental duties of the government to offer quality health care to its civilians. Some people debate that private hospitals are better for the patience, whilst another group of people think that government hospitals treat people free of cost and organise by the government. My notion is that governmental facilities are always required, but there should be no restriction on private health care.
On the one hand, private health care offers competitive and qualitative medical services to the people. Also, highly qualified professionals are hired to work for the community to ensure a certain enhanced quality of services offered. Moreover, private sector units are profit making organizations that invest a significant amount of their profits in acquiring latest technology and research. This is highly beneficial to the patients in the long run. Finally, private hospitals offer better facilities like 24 hour emergency services, ambulance, networks and super specialty hospitals and so on. Though, on the flip side, it is also true that some private hospitals sometime overcharge their patients to maximize profits.
On the other hand, one of the best thing about government hospitals is that it offers cost effective and better accessibility. In addition, it is available in the smallest of towns and villages of the country, where under- privileged people are benefited from it as well as governments can get donations and allocate funds to offer health care to the civilians. However, it is often observed that public health care centres may not provide satisfactory services primarily because of the huge cost of free health care.
To recapitulate, it is evident that both systems of offering health care have their own merits and demerits and yet both are required in present day societies. Hence, I opine that private healthcare should not be eliminated.
It is one of the fundamental duties of the
government
to
offer
quality
health
care
to its civilians.
Some
people
debate that
private
hospitals
are better for the patience, whilst another group of
people
think
that
government
hospitals
treat
people
free of cost and
organise
by the
government
. My notion is that governmental facilities are always required,
but
there should be no restriction on
private
health
care.
On the one hand,
private
health
care
offers
competitive and qualitative medical
services
to the
people
.
Also
,
highly
qualified professionals
are hired
to work for the community to ensure a certain enhanced quality of
services
offered.
Moreover
,
private
sector units are profit making organizations that invest a significant amount of their profits in acquiring
latest
technology and research. This is
highly
beneficial to the patients in the long run.
Finally
,
private
hospitals
offer
better facilities like
24 hour
emergency
services
, ambulance, networks and super specialty
hospitals
and
so
on. Though, on the flip side, it is
also
true that
some
private
hospitals
sometime overcharge their patients to maximize profits.
On the other hand
, one of the best thing about
government
hospitals
is that it
offers
cost effective and better accessibility.
In addition
, it is available in the smallest of towns and villages of the country, where under- privileged
people
are benefited
from it
as well
as
governments
can
get
donations and allocate funds to
offer
health
care
to the civilians.
However
, it is
often
observed that public
health
care
centres
may not provide satisfactory
services
primarily
because
of the huge cost of free
health
care.
To recapitulate, it is evident that both systems of offering
health
care
have their
own
merits and demerits and
yet
both
are required
in present day societies.
Hence
, I opine that
private
healthcare should not
be eliminated
.