It is a fact that, almost 80% of world's wealth is managed by 20% of the Countries. There are many people who think, it's the responsibility of developed countries to support poor countries with food and education. Yes, it is important for rich countries to support developing countries with food & education during a humanitarian crisis, but it should not be a long time policy. In this essay, I will put forth my views with suitable examples.
Firstly, during a crisis like civil war or a natural disaster, it's important for developing countries to support the country in crisis, but it should be only till the time the country recovers from the crisis. If rich countries keep supporting poor countries, in the long run the host country will ever develop their own governing systems and this will have an adverse effect on the welfare of the people. For example, after the post war era, North Korea was completely dependent on Soviet union for their basic need like food, fuel, infrastructure etc. . But once the Soviet Union pulled out of the alliance, it led to the complete breakdown of the country.
Secondly, instead of providing food and education, rich countries should help poor countries to develop their own policies and governing mechanism. If developing countries are completely dependent on aides from rich countries, then it will end with huge debts and it will lead to a full scale financial crisis. For example, some of the smaller countries in Asia pacific region, is still dependent on aides from developed countries like the US and France, this has completely drowned these smaller countries in debt.
To sum up, I believe, when a country is in crisis, it's the prerogative of developed countries to support them, but this should be used as opportunity to hijack or interfere in their internal affairs.
It is a fact that, almost 80% of world's wealth
is managed
by 20% of the
Countries
. There are
many
people
who
think
, it's the responsibility of developed
countries
to
support
poor
countries
with
food
and education. Yes, it is
important
for
rich
countries
to
support
developing
countries
with
food
& education during a humanitarian
crisis
,
but
it should not be a long time policy. In this essay, I will put forth my views with suitable examples.
Firstly
, during a
crisis
like civil war or a natural disaster, it's
important
for developing
countries
to
support
the
country
in
crisis
,
but
it should be
only
till the time the
country
recovers from the
crisis
. If
rich
countries
keep
supporting poor
countries
, in the long run the host
country
will ever develop their
own
governing systems and this will have an adverse effect on the welfare of the
people
.
For example
, after the
post war
era, North Korea was completely dependent on
Soviet union
for their basic need like
food
, fuel, infrastructure etc.
.
But
once the Soviet Union pulled out of the alliance, it led to the complete breakdown of the country.
Secondly
,
instead
of providing
food
and education,
rich
countries
should
help
poor
countries
to develop their
own
policies and governing mechanism. If developing
countries
are completely dependent on aides from
rich
countries
, then it will
end
with huge debts and it will lead to a full scale financial
crisis
.
For example
,
some of the
smaller
countries
in Asia pacific region, is
still
dependent on aides from developed
countries
like the US and France, this has completely drowned these smaller
countries
in debt.
To sum up, I believe, when a
country
is in
crisis
, it's the prerogative of developed
countries
to
support
them,
but
this should be
used
as opportunity to hijack or interfere in their internal affairs.