Some people work for the same organisation all their working life. Others think that it is better to work for different organisations. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. v.16
Some people work for the same organisation all their working life. Others think that it is better to work for different organisations. v. 16
Some people think that lawbreakers should be sent to jail. However, others think that better talents among those should be made to work. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Because obeying a law is one of the keystones in civil governments, who runs counter to this is punished by governmental institutions. Discussions are held about being in prison or alternative punishment which would be better for person who committed a crime. This essay will discuss the debate, and give a concluding view.
On the one hand, as who support the sending lawbreakers to prison, one of the significant factors is security of mankind. If offenders were in freedom after their punishment, they would be dangerous for others too. For example, statistical results show us because of not being busted lawbreakers can carry out new crimes again. A second factor is the regeneration of criminals. After sending to prison they face-to-face some restrictions which are important to form their positive opinions, and all of these limitations are able to help to change their future life. For instance, because of not encountering any restraints lawbreakers, most of which were put in prison by courts, try not to commit an offence again.
However, opponents think that chance must be given also offenders. People, who are criminal, can regenerate without prison sentence, because this so-called unexpected compassion of government to them would be an impact on their behaviour positive.
To conclude, sending to prison or alternative punishment has to depend on the type of crimes. If a crime was petty, governmental institutions should not receive lawbreakers imprisonment, on the contrary, if a crime was violent, the offender must be put to prison.
Some
people
think
that
lawbreakers
should be
sent
to jail.
However
, others
think
that better talents among those should
be made
to work. Discuss both views and give your
own
opinion.
Because
obeying a law is one of the keystones in civil
governments
,
who
runs counter to this
is punished
by governmental institutions. Discussions
are held
about being in
prison
or alternative punishment which would be better for person
who
committed a
crime
. This essay will discuss the debate, and give a concluding view.
On the one hand, as
who
support the sending
lawbreakers
to
prison
, one of the significant factors is security of mankind. If offenders were in freedom after their punishment, they would be
dangerous
for others too.
For example
, statistical results
show
us
because
of not
being busted
lawbreakers
can carry out new
crimes
again. A second factor is the regeneration of criminals. After sending to
prison
they face-to-face
some
restrictions which are
important
to form their
positive
opinions, and all of these limitations are able to
help
to
change
their future life.
For instance
,
because
of not encountering any restraints
lawbreakers
, most of which
were put
in
prison
by courts, try not to commit an
offence
again.
However
, opponents
think
that chance
must
be
given
also
offenders.
People
,
who
are criminal, can regenerate without
prison
sentence,
because
this
so
-called unexpected compassion of
government
to them would be an impact on their
behaviour
positive
.
To conclude
, sending to
prison
or alternative punishment
has to
depend on the type of
crimes
. If a
crime
was petty, governmental institutions should not receive
lawbreakers
imprisonment,
on the contrary
, if a
crime
was violent, the offender
must
be put
to
prison
.
8Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
21Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
2Mistakes