During the recruiting proceedings companies are very selective about who they take on full-time to work. This is a vital process that could determine the organization's output. As a result, it is imperative to select the best candidate for the position. In this essay, I will discuss the benefits of each type of person and explain my support for the latter.
While others argue that independent persons are autonomous and need little supervision; they are sometimes inflexible and unpleasant. This in-turn creates a dictatorial environment and disrupt the group's synergy. In contrast, cooperative teammates are able grow each other, transfer knowledge, remove key man dependents and cover or remove the shortcomings of others. For example, employees may specialize in different skill-set, but they are able to share and teach each other. Moreover, they form lasting relationships and creates a willing spirit to go beyond the call of duty.
Although there is an initial high cost to work in a team environment and going though the different phases, such as Forming, Storming, Norming and Performing; the pros exceed the cons, therefore making it the preferred choice for companies. Equally important, it gives the company an opportunity to create a structure and maintain itself in the eventuality that someone senior leave the company. In that instance, a member of the team can be promoted to replace the exiting person, creates space for a junior member and maintains the structure.
In conclusion, it is usually less taxing initially to select an independent candidate, but cost the agency more in the long run. Conversely, for hiring members who can work well in a team dynamic, not to mention more risk averse and more secure
During the recruiting proceedings
companies
are
very
selective about
who
they take on full-time to work. This is a vital process that could determine the organization's output.
As a result
, it is imperative to select the best candidate for the position. In this essay, I will discuss the benefits of each type of person and
explain
my support for the latter.
While others argue that independent persons are autonomous and need
little
supervision; they are
sometimes
inflexible and unpleasant. This in-turn
creates
a dictatorial environment and disrupt the group's synergy.
In contrast
, cooperative teammates are
able grow
each
other
, transfer knowledge, remove key
man
dependents and cover or remove the shortcomings of others.
For example
, employees may specialize in
different
skill
-set,
but
they are able to share and teach each
other
.
Moreover
, they form lasting relationships and
creates
a willing spirit to go beyond the
call of duty
.
Although there is an initial high cost to work in a team environment and going
though
the
different
phases, such as Forming, Storming,
Norming
and Performing; the pros exceed the cons,
therefore
making it the preferred choice for
companies
.
Equally
important
, it gives the
company
an opportunity to
create
a structure and maintain itself in the eventuality that someone senior
leave
the
company
. In that instance, a member of the team can
be promoted
to replace the exiting person,
creates
space for a junior member and maintains the structure.
In conclusion
, it is
usually
less taxing
initially
to select an independent candidate,
but
cost the agency more in the long run.
Conversely
, for hiring members who can work well in a team dynamic, not to mention more
risk
averse and more secure