At some point, it is no-brainer that people can enjoy more happiness at a young age rather than when they had become older. The complete opposite view also has good points to stand, even with growing responsibilities that adults should bare. I think the opposite view couldn’t be more true.
The best evidence to the youth side of the argument is children’s access to freedom. Thinking outside the box is an ability that most adults have to learn and practice, yet for young generations they have it by nature. Without the strained obligations and rules one has to learn during the adultholds, those teenagers simply can enjoy more in life. For example, a mother looks at the window in her house thinking, “It’s time to clean the window. ”, a 16 years girl would look at the same window and thinking, “What a wonderful day today! ”. That’s clear that the girl knows how to be happy.
For adults, they have learned how to avoid on the things that had made them unhappy in the past to ever happen again. Therefore, by cutting out the misfortunes, those grownups can live in a happier life than they couldn’t have lived otherwise. I’ve seen in TV many times that a child had broken his bones by being audacious when playing sports. However, I don’t see that happened to an adult who had broken his bones by playing sports carelessly, or didn’t wear pads. Thus, I do believe adults can actually enjoy freedom in a better way compare to teenagers.
In conclusion, in comparing the two different age groups, the first group enjoys more happiness by having more freedom, while the opposite group enjoys more by eliminating the misfortunes they have learned. I believe those who master the process of elimination can harvest the most thrils and smiles in life.
At
some
point, it is no-brainer that
people
can
enjoy
more happiness at a young age
rather
than when they had become older. The complete opposite view
also
has
good
points to stand, even with growing responsibilities that
adults
should
bare
. I
think
the opposite view couldn’t be more true.
The best evidence to the youth side of the argument is children’s access to freedom. Thinking outside the box is an ability that most
adults
have to
learn and practice,
yet
for young generations they have it by nature. Without the strained obligations and
rules
one
has to
learn during the
adultholds
, those
teenagers
simply
can
enjoy
more in life.
For example
, a mother looks at the window in her
house
thinking, “It’s time to clean the window. ”, a 16 years girl would look at the same window and thinking, “What a wonderful day
today
! ”. That’s
clear
that the girl knows how to be happy.
For
adults
, they have learned how to avoid on the things that had made them unhappy in the past to ever happen again.
Therefore
, by cutting out the misfortunes, those grownups can
live
in a happier life than they couldn’t have
lived
otherwise
. I’ve
seen
in TV
many
times that a child had broken his bones by being audacious when playing sports.
However
, I don’t
see
that happened to an adult who had broken his bones by playing sports
carelessly
, or didn’t wear pads.
Thus
, I do believe
adults
can actually
enjoy
freedom in a better way compare to
teenagers
.
In conclusion
, in comparing the two
different
age groups, the
first
group
enjoys
more happiness by having more freedom, while the opposite group
enjoys
more by eliminating the misfortunes they have learned. I believe those who master the process of elimination can harvest the most
thrils
and smiles in life.